Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Like IB

Suit Yourself

On Thursday, the Indianapolis City County Council Municipal Corporations Committee voted 5-3 to levy a $15 million PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes) against the Capital Improvement Board to help pay for public safety and fill a $65 million budget gap.  When questioned about the legality of the action, PILOT proponent and Council Vice-President Brian Mahern said he was not an attorney.   On that point he is correct, because no lawyer would ever set his client up to be sued for $15 million and lose poorly because of the flagrant violation of state statute.

Instead of adopting Mayor Greg Ballard’s budget proposal, which includes eliminating the Homestead Property Tax Credit which costs the taxpayers $13 million to administer $8 million of tax relief and for all intent and purposes has people who rent subsidizing tax relief for homeowners, the Council is moving forward with dipping into the CIB’s cash reserves.  By doing this, the Council is putting itself on a track to lose a legal battle which will not only put the city in worse shape than it is now, but sets a very dangerous precedent that should scare all not-for-profits in the county.

For those of you unfamiliar with PILOTs they are used as a way for local governments to get revenue from entities that do not pay property taxes, i.e. universities and utilities.  However, there are rules that local governments must follow; they can’t just levy a PILOT whenever they feel like it.  Under IC 36-3-2-10, PILOTS must be treated in the same manner as taxes for purposes of all procedural and substantive provisions of law.

That means the properties under CIB control must be properly assessed, not a “cursory” assessment as what was done by the Marion County Assessor’s office, which they admitted to me in a Friday phone call.  Second, and most importantly, the law says for an assessment to be valid it must have been done by March 1 of the prior year.  On March 1, 2012 the CIB was exempt from taxation.  Now this doesn’t mean the Council does not have the authority to levy the PILOT, they just can’t do it this year.   Next year is fair game.

A more global issue that should have any not-for-profit concerned is that if the Council can do this to the CIB, what is to stop them from doing this to every hospital, university and other entity in Indianapolis from getting hit with a PILOT whenever the city feels it needs the money.  I am all for a real discussion on PILOTs, especially since there is a large amount of property in the city which does not pay property taxes, per se.  But doing it in this manner only creates more problems than it solves.    And we haven’t even thrown in the other legal and political issues this is causing.  There are rumblings that Indiana lawmakers who bailed out the CIB a few years ago are livid at the Council’s actions and some are looking at taking the CIB and its properties away from the city and putting them and their revenue under state control.

Speaking of state control, the Council may want to go back and check it’s math on the PILOT because the assessment of Lucas Oil Stadium may have been improperly included in that figure.  The CIB does not own Lucas Oil, they merely operate it.  Lucas Oil is owned by the Indiana Stadium & Convention Building Authority and I have yet to come across the statutory provision that allows the city to levy a PILOT against the state.

If Brian Mahern were an attorney, he would have looked at that before moving forward with this PILOT scheme, but as he admitted his not an attorney, and after looking at this idiotic scheme, not much of anything else for that matter.

 

  • West Side Guest

    I’m sure Mahern consulted with Frost Brown, oh wait that is another over-extending Democrat. My bad…

  • Marco

    Perhaps if Ballard had reigned in some of the spending from the Sheriff’s department, it wouldn’t have come to this. Judging by the loss of manpower, it’s painfully obvious to everybody that IMPD has plenty of money for their raises (the department has shrunk by THAT much.) Perhaps Ballard should figure out where all that extra scratch went instead of advocating yet another tax raise.

  • AWB

    Abdul, if what you said is true then we have crass idiots on the city council who are running it as if they’re on the board of directors of a HOA. With that said sometimes I have a difficult time believing any group of individuals are that ill informed which makes me believe this was done for another reason with the foreknowledge this would ultimately fail. Maybe so the council members can shrug their shoulders when it fails and tell everyone “Well…at least we tried”

  • Ramon

    Now that the council has provided Ballard with $15 million that can be used for a new recruit class and to honor the contract for a raise for our police and firefighters, the big question is will he use it for that. The ball is in the mayor’s court and the citizens expect that it will be used for public safety. The mayor did say that public safety was his #1 priority. What are you going to do, Mayor Ballard??

  • http://www.facebook.com/AttyAbdul Abdul-Hakim Shabazz

    He won’t use it. It was illegally obtained. A lawsuit will happen and the Legislature will be more pissed off at Indianapolis than usual.

  • Diogenes In Indy

    LOL – so many Indy shadow government committees, so little $$$. And please don’t make me laugh regarding the legality of any of this…..