Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Like IB

Looking for Lugar Republicans

Somehow I get the strange feeling that “Lugar Republicans” are in pretty high demand these days.  Democrat Joe Donnelly mentioned how he worked with Richard Lugar to save  Indiana’s automotive industry.   Richard Mourdock does in a roundabout way when he talks about working with Governor Daniels to keep Indiana on track.  And Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Gregg mentions in about every stump speech he can.

So why are these “Lugar Republicans” so valuable?  Just look at the last two polls that have come out in the race for the United States Senate.

Rasmussen has Donnelly and Mourdock basically tied at 42-40, with 11% undecided and Donnelly’s own recently released internal poll had the race at 41-40.  Four percent went to Libertarian Andy Horning and the remaining 15% was either undecided or none of the above.

Where the “Lugar Republicans” come in are in both the Rasmussen and Donnelly poll, both oversampled Republican voters;  45-32 in the Rasmussen poll and Republicans had an 8-point party identification lead in the Donnelly poll.   Also take into account Mitt Romney is easily winning Indiana, according to Rasmussen, 51-35 over President Barack Obama.  And everything we hear in the race for Governor is that you would much rather be Mike Pence than John Gregg right now.

For Romney and Pence to be doing well and Mourdock in a dead heat, that tells me that those “Lugar Republicans” aren’t sold on Mourdock.  And although Lugar and Mourdock have reportedly buried the hatchet, I will believe it when I see the two of them campaigning together in Indiana and Lugar does some commercials.

Some of my Republican friends are trying to figure out why someone who votes for Romney and Pence would split their ticket and vote for Donnelly.  The answer is pretty simple, they’re mad.  What you can’t explain by logic and reasoning can very easily be explained by emotion.  They are still ticked off at the primary, the Indiana Tea Party (whose RINO hunting rhetoric doesn’t help build bridges by the way) and Mourdock really needs to do some reaching out to those folks and getting them on board.   And don’t forget, Hoosiers are notorious for splitting their tickets at the top:  Bush-O’Bannon – 2000; Bayh-Daniels – 2004;  Obama-Daniels 2008.

Now granted this is still a very red state and the fundamentals still lean toward a Mourdock victory, however, the fact that Romney and Pence are running away with their races and Mourdock isn’t tells me that the Lugar Republicans could be the deciding factor in this race.

 

 

 

  • G Square

    I think that Mourdock perfectly represents the intransigence of the extreme Right.  His self professed intention to never compromise is a recipe for ongoing congressional inaction.  The US has many urgent problems that need solutions, even imperfect ones.  Having the Left and the Right zealots scream at each other from their bunkers does nothing to move our country forward.  I can only vote for a Senator who appears willing to listen and make a fair, informed decision and vote accordingly. I am an Independent but I’ve always admired Lugar for his ability to do just that. 

  • Pascal

    Lugar’s idea to bail out New York City and Chrysler (the first time) might have seemed to be a good idea at the time but by setting the precedent-he has cost us billions if not trillions.  As we have seen, jobs can be disrupted by a bankruptcy proceeding but they are not generally lost.  So, Joe lies.  And, Lugar Republicans lap them up, proving the old adage that the corruption of the best is the worst.  So, Chrysler was sold to Fiat?  So what?  Joe Donnelly helped the UAW STEAL pension dollars from 1) teachers 2) policemen 3) Delphi workers.  Joe is a thief-can’t be voting for thieves in Indiana anymore.

  • Me

    Ahhhhhh -
    G Square said “ongoing congressional inaction.”  That phrase is music to my ears.

  • Clutch Cargo

    All of politics is a wet-dream looking for someone else’s bed to foul. This is only further proof.

  • Black Light Specialist

    Clutch Cargo, Please may a trip with your black light to where Mourdock & Donnelly stay overnight. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Steele/100003244642468 David Steele

    We are fed up with moderates.  Take a stand, believe in something. 

    If do not like us, move.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Steele/100003244642468 David Steele

    Lugar had been moved to the left by his staff.  In most cases it does not matter who you elect because they are going to hire staff who lives in DC thus are into the mindset of DC.  It would be better that all staff lived in the home district and the representative just goes to DC to vote once a month.  Everything else, including committee meetings, could be done via teleconferences.  That way no one is corrupted by the DC culture.

    Most federal agencies should have most of their workers outside of DC, maybe create an offsite in the St Louis area.

  • Dave

    “Compromise” isn’t unilaterally defined by those on one side of the debate- that would be dictation.  

    Mourdock correctly identifies this problem (!!!), and that’s “the problem” for his opponents…

  • G Square

     Who is “we”?  What is your specific complaint about moderates?  People can adhere to a set of beliefs and still be moderate.  You can form compromises between disagreeing parties that alleviate problems.
    Move?  I think not.  Your dream of a nation in dogmatic lockstep has already been proven to be dangerous and unsuccessful.  Remember the USSR? Having everyone on the same party and plan worked wonderfully for them.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Steele/100003244642468 David Steele

    Comprise generally means that conservatives have to give in on their beliefs.  Moderates tend to avoid any belief in favor of being popular.

  • http://twitter.com/mchandlerjones Chandler Jones

    I’m still unclear as to where these “Lugar Republicans” are hiding. It seems that everyone is assuming the undecided voters in the Senate election are Lugar loyalists. I have not seen any evidence to suggest that is true, only the assumption that a certain voting bloc would prefer to write-in Lugar rather than vote for Mourdock.