Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Like IB

Here We Go Again

Will it ever stop?

First it was the Indiana Election Commission, then it was the Marion County Court, now it is the Marion County Election Board Thursday that will take up a challenge against Lugar’s qualifications to be on the ballot.

Indianapolis resident Greg Wright filed the challenge, saying that Lugar has failed to meet the qualifications to be on the ballot because he has failed to maintain a permanent physical residence in Indiana. Wright also dismisses the opinions of three Indiana Attorneys General that Lugar is eligible to be on the ballot.

The Lugar campaign says he does meet the qualifications and sounded familiar, successful arguments that he never gave up his residency to serve in the United States Senate.

The Election Board will hear the challenge on Thursday.  It has several options at its disposal.  Under state law the Board can…

  • Determine that there is substantial reason to believe an election law violation has occurred and no further action is required;
  • Determine that there is substantial reason to believe an election law violation has occurred and instruct counsel and staff to conduct further investigation pursuant to the Board’s direction;
  • Determine there is substantial reason to believe an election law violation has occurred,find that sufficient investigation has been made, and take appropriate action, such as referring the matter to the Marion County Prosecutor; or
  • Take all matters under advisement and reserve action for a later time.

Any decision can be reached by a simple majority.  There are two Democrats and one Republican on the Election Board.  Somehow I get that feeling that no matter what happens, this won’t be over anytime soon.

Ugh!!!

  • ricoC

    The only thing worse than racism is the false accusation of racism.  And these people have taken it to new heights.  Never in my life do I remember such a divided nation.  Our Community Organizer-in-Chief is truly meeting his goals.

  • Scooter

     Agree with you, but then there are some real off the edge people doing things like this;

    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/racist-don-t-nig-anti-obama-bumper-sticker-162917634.html

    Racist?  Somewhat.

    Crappy attempt at humor?  Damn straight.

    Worthy of being called an “… IDIOT…” in public?  Sure.

    Worthy of all the press & hullabaloo on social networks?  No. 

    When there are 230 million people living in this country, one foolish person does not a racist country make….  just like those two purported Black Panthers hanging out in front of a polling place with batons during the last election…. they were just being deserving of the label, IDIOT.

      

  • ricoC

    I think it’s okay to call the Black Panthers idiots AND racists (unless you work for the DOJ, that is).

  • Scooter

     My point was that there are racist leanings on all sides, as well as chicken little attitudes about this whole race thing.

    Idiot is a great term for those that would continue to push this race thing as a method to control others… as well as those that allow it to happen.
     

  • Guest

    Ernie, get out and talk to people. I was at a Broad Ripple GOP Club meeting of 5th district candidates. The meeting started by asking for people to phone bank for Lugar.

  • Sherrie

    The Constitution requires that members of the House and Senate fulfill three requirements:
    All members of the House must be at least 25 years old, and members of the Senate must be at least 30 years old.Members of the House must have been a U.S. citizen for at least seven years, and members of the Senate must have been a U.S. citizen for at least nine years.They have to be an “inhabitant” of the state “when elected.”
    As a result, according to the Congressional Research Service, committing a crime cannot constitutionally disqualify someone from serving in Congress. And the state has no say in determining whether or not someone is qualified to serve in the House or Senate:

    CRS: [S]ince a State does not have the authority to add qualifications for federal offices, the fact of conviction, even for a felony offense, could not be used to keep a candidate off of the ballot under State law either as a direct disqualification of convicted felons from holding or being a candidate for office, or as a disqualification of one who is no longer a “qualified elector” in the State. Once a person meets the three constitutional qualifications of age, citizenship and inhabitancy in the State when elected, that person, if duly elected, is constitutionally “qualified” to serve in Congress, even if a convicted felon.
    Prison is not a bar to running for federal office, either. In 1798, Rep. Matthew Lyon ran for Congress from prison and won. He assumed his seat in Congress after serving four months in prison for “libeling” President John Adams. An effort was made to expel Lyon from the House, but it failed.
    Ultimately, it is up to the House or Senate chamber to determine whether or not an elected official is qualified to serve if a challenge is raised

  • Gp38dash2

     The one set of offices one can run for with felony convictions pertain to the US Congress- US House & Us Senate.

  • Scooter

    Hmmm… almost a full week has gone by, and Wurst(less) has yet to provide any substantiation to his racist accusation…

    As if I had any doubt it was a woof story.