Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Time for a Single-Payer Health Care System

(With Congress on the road to repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, I thought it was appropriate to dust off this column I wrote back in 2012.   It was brilliant then and is even more so now. )

As a conservative-libertarian leaning political pundit, I am now convinced more than ever that it is high time in this country for a single-payer health care system. Before you go into cardiac arrest, you might want to read the rest of this.

You know the Supreme Court upheld most of the President’s health care plan last week, I think the results will be horrible for Indiana because more people on Medicaid will put more pressure on the state budget to an estimated tune of at least $2 billion. The excise tax on medical devices will likely have a negative impact on places like Warsaw where the medical device sector is key to that region’s economy. And throw in the fact that more people will be on a government program just can’t be a good thing. So what’s a pundit to do? Advocate a single-payer health care system, with the single-payer being you, the individual, who goes out and gets your own health insurance. We can get there by ending employer-provided health insurance.

Most of us get coverage through our jobs, and if you have no job, odds are you don’t have insurance. And health-care costs eat up a significant portion of a business’s budget. If you eliminate the break, there really isn’t a reason for an employer to provide insurance and they will start dropping employees like a rock. The plus side of this is that health-care costs will also drop. Part of the problem with our health-care system is no one knows how much anything costs because a third party is picking up the tab; this is a recipe for disaster.

And I don’t believe employers dropping insurance will lead to fewer insured. That free market is an odd thing. You will be amazed at how many companies will pop up providing insurance. And since businesses no longer have the expense they can actually hire more people. As a small business owner, I constantly hear stories from people who want to bring people on board full-time but can’t afford to, primarily because of health-care costs.And when we are directly responsible for paying for our own health care, we tend to take better care of ourselves. By the way, you already buy your car insurance, homeowner’s insurance, and life insurance.

And for those of you wondering about those who really can’t afford insurance, I don’t see any reason why states can’t adopt a moderate plan where the working poor, for a small fee, can purchase a basic, bare bones plan.And there are some other things that can be done like allow insurance to be sold across state lines. Then, however, insurance companies would have to register in states where they sell their products, and we could eliminate mandates on what health insurance providers must cover. This approach makes a lot more sense in the 21st Century than more taxes and more government regulation.

 

 

  • malercous

    Great column, I agree 100%. We should have had a gov’t option (Medicare for all) decades ago, but it was never sold right. Instead of appealing to conservatives’ (imaginary) sense of concern for people, if the program were to be presented as a pro-business move it would be overwhelming popular.

    If businesses like GM (or any manufacturer) did not have to provide health insurance for its employees & retirees, it would significantly lower their fixed costs so they could compete on a level playing field with companies in nations who have gov’t provided health care/insurance. That’d make our exports cheaper so we’d sell more, our companies more profitable & still retain good paying blue collar jobs for American workers. What’s not to love about that?

    And don’t you think it’s time to admit to yourself that you’re not a Republican? No Rep. is pro-choice, that’s a litmus test. No Rep. would ever agree to, much less advocate for, gov’t provided health ins., another litmus test. You’re also not strongly pro-2A, yet another litmus test. You have other views not aligned with GOP orthodoxy, so by definition: You are NOT a Republican. Everyone else knows this but you. Your political views are to the left of many Democratic politicians.

    Can you name 1 elected GOP politician who is as far left as you? Just admit it, you’re a conservative Democrat. I’ve got you to add the modifier “cultural” when calling yourself a Muslim & now it’s time to get over your Daddy issues & admit what your political views really are called. Kudos on the column & I still love ya Abdul.