Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Like IB

Indiana Loses Another Round in Anti-Abortion Fight

The state of Indiana has lost a federal administrative appeal regarding its efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and stop the agency from receiving Medicaid funds.

Lawmakers voted in 2011 to deny Medicaid funding to health providers that also provided abortions, except for hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers.  However, that law was turned down by Medicaid officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  The state appealed that decision, however federal officials say Indiana’s law ran afoul of the “Free Choice of Provider” provision in federal Medicaid law.

That law states that an individual who qualifies for Medicaid may seek services from a qualified provider and the state may not deny them access to those services.  The state had tried to argue that it was merely following an extension of federal law which prohibits Medicaid dollars from paying for abortions, or in this case indirectly subsidizing them.  However federal officials did not buy that argument.

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller’s office released the following statement.

“Like any other petitioner who is entitled to a hearing, the State of Indiana appreciated the opportunity to try to explain to CMS the Indiana Legislature’s public policy decision that private providers ought not indirectly subsidize abortion procedures through Medicaid dollars and that the legislation had that separation in mind. My office by law must defend the laws the Legislature passes, and we have always contended this is a dispute between the state and a federal government agency, not between the state and a Medicaid provider, and ultimately should be decided in the appropriate venue,” Zoeller said.

Zoeller’s office has not said whether it will continue its appeal further.  It is also reviewing whether to continue the legal challenge to uphold the law defunding Planned Parenthood in federal court.  In June of last year Judge Tonya Walton Pratt an injunction was issued against Indiana’s law.

 

  • Pascal

    Well, duh!  Judge Pratt upheld parts of the law and disagreed with parts of the law.  The parts of the law she disagreed with were appealed.  A decision on that will be more useful than the acts of political appointees acting politically.  

  • Pascal

    “Among the many troubling elements is the fact that expert testimony is cited on page 12 as saying that “there is a significant probability that Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood cross-subsidize its abortion services”. The CMS ruled, in effect, that this is not sufficient reason for the state to end funding.  It is also significant to note that the ruling cites an LSA memo to the senate warning that it could not do this.  That memo was drafted by a former Planned Parenthood intern working in the upper levels at FSSA – now we know why.” 

         So, an LSA memo written as above, is worth quoting?  Where is that new Editor of the Star to direct his dipstick puff piece writer over to FSSA and do some reporting?  I’m curious to hear how “straight” the Memo might have been, knowing of course, that the Senate is full of lawyers who paid enough attention to the Memo to ascertain its value.

  • Pascal

    http://libertylawsite.org/2012/07/06/after-right-to-work-takes-effect-in-indiana-unions-seek-a-judicial-bailout/   So, when Indiana speaks, the losers head for the courts (previously staffed with liberals) to thwart the public will.  

  • Ramon

    When is Zoeller going to catch on and stop wasting tax payer money?  Better yet,  when are the tea party Republicans going to quit passing legislation that they know is unconstitutional but do it anyway to appease the radicals of their movement?

  • Pascal

    I think Pat Bauer voted for some of these items along with a good number of other Democrats.  

  • Pascal

    Too, Ramon, the AG’s office is pretty much fixed costs.  As to what is constitutional or not-there is no legal theory that extends, currently, past the whims of the robed ones.  In other words, we are not talking law here.

  • Pascal

    So far duh media have not reported on the hearing examiner’s previous internship with Planned Parenthood.  At least I’ve heard one report that such was the case and am checking with that source to be sure.  Perhaps he has a fine judicial future ahead of him.

  • julie anderson

    I think we never give up our self in the medicare or any health related issue.As we carry more advantages!!
    http://www.medicareidaho.com/