Comments on: Primary Colors http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html Indiana Barrister is the source for local Indianapolis and Indiana news, politics and commentary. Fri, 24 May 2013 15:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Pascal http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62742 Pascal Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:49:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62742 Pascal is still being carded at Super Target when he tries to purchase wines. Pascal is still being carded at Super Target when he tries to purchase wines.

]]> By: Rico http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62740 Rico Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:48:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62740 Pathetically right! Absolutely NOBODY is disenfranchised by being asked for his  freaking identification before he CHOOSES to make the most profoundly democratic decision he can make as an American!  STFU!!!!! Pathetically right! Absolutely NOBODY is disenfranchised by being asked for his  freaking identification before he CHOOSES to make the most profoundly democratic decision he can make as an American!  STFU!!!!!

]]> By: Dave http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62739 Dave Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:44:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62739 ? Demonize... Hitler?   ? Demonize… Hitler?  

]]> By: Think Again http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62738 Think Again Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:34:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62738 You're pathetic. But kinda funny. You’re pathetic. But kinda funny.

]]> By: Think Again http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62737 Think Again Tue, 24 Apr 2012 22:33:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62737 It's just a word, Dave.  Demonize it all you want.   It’s just a word, Dave.  Demonize it all you want.  

]]> By: Sheri2names http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62731 Sheri2names Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:04:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62731 I lived in Louisiana, which also had everybody-in-a-bucket elections. It had runoffs if no candidate got 50 percent. The results? People knew they got a do-over, which resulted in such luminous runoffs as Edwin Edwards vs. David Duke. And if you hold the notion that such elections would yield higher quality candidates, think again: Illinois and Louisiana political figures are known as some of the nation's most corrupt. No thanks. I lived in Louisiana, which also had everybody-in-a-bucket elections. It had runoffs if no candidate got 50 percent. The results? People knew they got a do-over, which resulted in such luminous runoffs as Edwin Edwards vs. David Duke. And if you hold the notion that such elections would yield higher quality candidates, think again: Illinois and Louisiana political figures are known as some of the nation’s most corrupt. No thanks.

]]> By: MacReady http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62730 MacReady Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:38:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62730 No.  When this went to court the anti-Voter ID people lost because they could not provide ONE person who would be disenfranchised. And the person they picked to name as the primary affiant in the suit, if I recall correctly, was found to have worked at the BMV. Furthermore, the driving force behind Voter ID in Rhode Island was a minority Democrat.  Since when has "voting integrity" had multiple meanings? No.  When this went to court the anti-Voter ID people lost because they could not provide ONE person who would be disenfranchised.

And the person they picked to name as the primary affiant in the suit, if I recall correctly, was found to have worked at the BMV.

Furthermore, the driving force behind Voter ID in Rhode Island was a minority Democrat.  Since when has “voting integrity” had multiple meanings?

]]> By: Dave http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62729 Dave Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:21:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62729 Definitional clues might exist in very different outcomes. Definitional clues might exist in very different outcomes.

]]> By: Rico http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62728 Rico Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:48:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62728 By asking for an ID?? What a joke!  Why don't you just say that democrats (the ones crying about it) are too stupid, lazy, or ignorant to get a photo ID to vote? It's obvious the dems just want to cheat!  Barry supporters don't mind getting an ID to pick up a forty at 500 liquors. So why is it so hard to get one to vote? By asking for an ID?? What a joke!  Why don’t you just say that democrats (the ones crying about it) are too stupid, lazy, or ignorant to get a photo ID to vote? It’s obvious the dems just want to cheat!  Barry supporters don’t mind getting an ID to pick up a forty at 500 liquors. So why is it so hard to get one to vote?

]]> By: Think Again http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2012/04/primary_colors-6.html/comment-page-1#comment-62727 Think Again Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:36:00 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=7443#comment-62727 Very few, to be honest.  Voter suppression is the rule of the day, here, in most southern states, and too many other places.  We seem to relish in tamping-down the voter turnout.   Very few, to be honest.  Voter suppression is the rule of the day, here, in most southern states, and too many other places.  We seem to relish in tamping-down the voter turnout.  

]]>