It is not black and white but would depend on whether they rent this facility for other non-political events and whether they treat all political events the same.  From an IRS publication;

Business Activity

The question of whether an activity constitutes participation or intervention
in a political campaign may also arise in the context of a business activity of
the organization, such as selling or renting of mailing lists, the leasing of
office space, or the acceptance of paid political advertising. In this context,
some of the factors to be considered in determining whether the organization has
engaged in political campaign intervention include the following:

• Whether the good, service or facility is available to candidates in the
same election on an equal basis,

• Whether the good, service, or facility is available only to candidates and
not to the general public,

• Whether the fees charged to candidates are at the organization’s customary
and usual rates, and

• Whether the activity is an ongoing activity of the organization or whether
it is conducted only for a particular candidate.

Example 17: Museum K is a section 501(c)(3) organization. It owns an
historic building that has a large hall suitable for hosting dinners and
receptions. For several years, Museum K has made the hall available for rent to
members of the public. Standard fees are set for renting the hall based on the
number of people in attendance, and a number of different organizations have
rented the hall. Museum K rents the hall on a first come, first served basis.
Candidate P rents Museum K’s social hall for a fundraising dinner. Candidate
P’s campaign pays the standard fee for the dinner. Museum K is not involved in
political campaign intervention as a result of renting the hall to Candidate P
for use as the site of a campaign fundraising dinner.

Example 18: Theater L is a section 501(c)(3) organization. It maintains a
mailing list of all of its subscribers and contributors. Theater L has never
rented its mailing list to a third party. Theater L is approached by the
campaign committee of Candidate Q, who supports increased funding for the arts.
Candidate Q’s campaign committee offers to rent Theater L’s mailing list for a
fee that is comparable to fees charged by other similar organizations. Theater L
rents its mailing list to Candidate Q’s campaign committee. Theater L declines
similar requests from campaign committees of other candidates. Theater L has
intervened in a political campaign.

As long as she pays rent for the use of the facility,  it is permissible.

Did we not see IMPD officers in Kennedy spots?

I’ll be happy just to see Crawford gone. He has done NOTHING to bring development to our district. The only issues he has shown interest in have been racial and it is usually him stirring the pot of discontent. I’m also glad to know that Brown is no longer in the running. Vernon has already proven that he is a lazy, do nothing councilman, all we needed was another LAZY do nothing representative. An empty seat would provide better constituent services than Bill Crawford or Vernon Brown.

I am here to help. I love not-for-profits and think they do a lot of good work, even yours.  Too bad you didn’t get elected though, we could have spent a lot more time together.  Hope you’re doing better after the breakdown election night.

wow. class act, abdul.

I am certain that your mother taught you to be gracious and not belittle people who lose.  When did you forget what she taught yoou?   This post of yours is downright vulgar.

It’s not quite that simple.  If they let one political group rent it but not another that would be a problem.  See above. Also if they don’t make it open to non-political groups to rent that also would be a problem.

Try telling these black churches that Republicans can campaign there as well.

I heard from someone who has talked with Vernon Brown. As of now Vern hasn’t agreed to step aside.