Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Kennedy Campaign’s Copyright Infringement

The campaign for Democratic Mayoral candidate Melina Kennedy has been forced to pull an Internet ad ad attacking incumbent Greg Ballard on job creation because the footage used violated federal copyright law.

The campaign used clips from an RTV 6 newscast of reporter Kara Kenny questioning the Mayor on job creation numbers and him walking away after a few minutes.   (Full disclosure, I work at 6 as a political analyst.) The campaign used the ad the imply the city’s job creation numbers were not accurate.  The ad appeared on both the campaign’s website and on the Indianapolis Star web’s page.

However, the campaign never got permission from RTV 6 to use the material which is copyrighted intellectual property.   Once notified by station management, the campaign tried to get permission after the fact, but was denied.  Under the “fair use” doctrine, there are times when you can use someone else’s copyrighted material, such as for teaching, research, scholarship, etc.  but not so much on political campaigns.

While the ad did have an effective element to it, I was surprised that no one decided to check the legality of using it before running with it; especially since the candidate is an attorney herself and this would fall under the category of  “things you learn during your first year as an attorney” and the campaign manager has experience with Organizing for America.

What’s also worth noting is that if someone at RTV 6 or the parent company McGraw-Hill really wanted to be a hard-nose about this they could sue the campaign for copyright infringement and also file criminal charges against them.   I’ve worked on a couple intellectual property cases before and if someone has a bug up their rear, it can be a real pain because the penalties are pretty stiff if you lose.

I guess now the campaign will know better for next time.

  • pascal

    Dumbocraps and thieves are closely related in many respects.Their more usual tactic is to take your property or income via taxation, then call the goods so obtained “ours” and then reward their patrons with government goodies. Of course, the R’s are not too far behind in emulation of this business model.

  • cynical sam

    Agreed. The R’s prefer the Asset Forfeiture Laws instituted by Daddy Bush in 89′. Started with ten violations, now over 200. Just keep criminalizing behavior until revenue streams are satisfied. Still the same question: do you prefer KGB or Gestapo with your fries?

  • cynical sam

    “because the footage used violated Federal Copyright Laws”

    Thats right. You must be a Fed to ignore/violate with impunity any and all Fed laws.

  • Think Again

    Sloppy, yeah. Disappointing too.

    But–here’s where you missed the Objective Boat AGAIN Abdul–were the charges leveled against Ballard correct?

    Indeed they were.

    Full Disclosure Request: did you have any phone conv with the 25th floor or GOP regarding this issue before you posted?

    Nobody pays much attention to Job “Creation” figures released by any campaign any more. The numbers can be skewered any way you want. For the average voters’ opinion on state of the economy…it doesn’t take much to put your ear to the ground. If I don’t have a job or I know many under-unemployed folks, campaign stats don’t mean squat.

  • cynical sam

    Then, are the unemployment statistics released by the BLS (some call it BS) also fudged by the current Campaigner-in-Chief via his Commerce Secretary, or is Shadowstats.com figure of 22% unemployment correct. We all know the old saw regarding statistics.

  • iwin

    Since when do the democrats follow the rules they gave the rest of us? Once again, they believe they are above all of us. At some point they should realize the old saying, “do as I say, and not as I do”, was meant to stay in the home when raising children. But then again, that’s the level the democrats see us; they are the parent and would like tell us how much we should have and do.
    And perhaps it would be interesting to know how much Kennedy was involved in the, Organizing for America, here in Indianapolis, or is that a conversation for another day?

  • Melyssa

    For that matter since when do the Republicans follow the rules they give the rest of us?

    The left vs. right paradigm is false. It is used to divide the sheep.

    The elites win no matter which fake team rules.

  • Pogden297

    Please, Melyssa, don’t use the word “paradigm.” I am so sick of hearing that word.

  • Pogden297

    Only prosecutors can file criminal charges. Private individuals can’t. I used to represent Disney, Guess, BUM International Oakley, etc, in copyright/trademark infringement matters. Trying to get a prosecutor to prosecute copyright/trademark infringement is virtually impossible. The federal civil laws on the subject are great though – you get treble damages and attorney’s fees. You can even assume damages in some situatons.

    The fact though is that our copyright laws are ignored more than they are honored. It’s the blatant violations though people are most concerned about, where people try to pass material off as their own even though they weren’t the creator of the material. Virtually every campaign involves the use of copyrighted material (often newspaper stories and headlines) and I doubt they get permission in advance…they just take it down if the copyright holder complains. Usually the holder of the copyright is happy to get the publicity if they get credit. One would have though WRTV would want the additional publciity…after all Kara Kenney links to her stories all the time on Facebook…trying to get more coveage on her stories. In this case though WRTV is probably concerned about appearing to prefer one candidate over another. It’s probably an overblown concern.

  • Wurstnitemare

    The Layton Commercials were also in clear violation.In fact Im willing to bet that about 50% of all political TV spots are in some kind of violation.So, I’m thinking that who ever is the consultant to the Dems is way out of their league.The piece was really not very well done, it coudl have been much harder hitting.

    However, Im thinking that Walker is way out of his league by not seeing this one coming.The MCRCC had to know this was going to happen.

  • indyernie

    TA how can you expect Kennedy (Peterson Lite) to run the city if she doesn’t respect the law. Oversights, mistakes etc happened constantly in the past with the Peterson/Kennedy team. IF this was an over sight then the mistake just reassures the fact that Kennedy isn’t ready to govern Indy. Do we really need more of the same again? Hell NO!

  • Pogden297

    Indyernie, the Ballard administration has repeatedly skirted the law when it comes to various projects they pursued. What about E. 450 Market development? That’s not a road the Ballard people want to go down.

  • cynical sam

    Then how about a phrase, like, “Paradigm Shift”. It is occurring, ignore it at your peril.

  • Taguritt4445

    Really? WRTV ran the ad on its website. If they had had such a problem with it, you’d think they would have pulled the ad and made a stink before it ran. This is causes me to think that Abdul is making this one up (again).

  • Abdul

    TA,

    No prior conversations with the 25th floor. I did ask my television brothers if MK’s campaign had permission to run the ad. The answer was “no”.

  • Abdul

    You can think what you want. I have some expertise in this area of law and did some checking. It is what it is. What you believe is not my problem.

  • Melyssa

    Yeah, I know, Paul. But in the case of me using it, I know what it means and why I am saying it.

  • Think Again

    Ernie: scream all you want. You’ve got 265 days left to enjoy Mayor Ballard. Make the most of them.

    As for me, I’ll be watching the city’s assets closely, to make sure Mayor Kennedy has something left to govern.

    The only drama left is the council margin.

  • Think Again

    It was a fair question, given your obvious bias. And a decent answer. Carry on my wayward son. There will be peace when you are done.

  • Think Again

    ooooh Zing

  • Think Again

    So you’re saying that in the real world of copyright litigation, cases like this don’t get very far. Not that Ms. Kennedy’s campaign should’ve done it, but a little perspective is worthwhile.

    And once again Paul’s combination of legal logic and common sense surpasses Abdul’s (“Sky is falling! Copyright violation! Ballard wouldn’t do THAT!”)

  • Think Again

    Nah, he’s not making it up. He’s just giving it more ink that it deserves. It is a copyright infringement. It’s just not that big of a deal.

    Kennedy shouldn’t have done it. The sun comes up tomorrow. And Ballard still leases/sells off city assets at an alarming rate, complete with insider deals.

    I wonder if Abdul will peruse the Ballard campaign finance reports, for contributions from water/parking meter benefactors, with the same zeal he pursued this “story” ?

    Tempest in a teapot.

  • Abdul

    TA,

    I used to think highly of you. :-)

  • pascal

    Yeah! And who are these “elites”?

  • pascal

    Melyssa, you are in the elites for knowing what words mean.

  • Wurstnitemare

    Abdul, could this be an equal time issue? We are well with in the window.

  • Barnard

    It is the responsibility of the copyright or trademark owner to police their mark. If RTV 6 asked Kennedy to remove the ad due to their copyright… and she did… than that’s the end of the story. Normal copyright/trademark stuff that happens every day.

    Abdul is, once again, trying to create a fire anywhere he sees a hint of smoke. As one of the primary spokespersons for the Ballard campaign that’s his job I guess.

    PS… for a political commentator I love the absence of any reference or comment on the CH6 job story and/or Ballard’s gun/drug amnesty programs even though he is supposedly adamantly opposed to such programs. That’s big local political news. You’re a political pundit…. I think that deserves some good political punditry, don’t you? It would just be better if you advertised that you are a GOP blogger/spokesperson. That’s ok. Nothing wrong with that, at least it would be honest.

  • Ash

    I’m sure it’ll come across as exciting, but Ballard was also correct in pointing out that he was just using the Peterson calculator in terms of job creation. The only baggage Kennedy brings to the table is her association with Peterson, look for Ballard’s handlers to exploit that.

    When everybody lies it’s a tie.

  • Rico

    Yeah, Melyssa, I’ll give you twenty cents to stop using that word………get it?…..huh?….get it?

  • Rico

    Then we should ALL question your judgment, Abdul.

  • Think Again

    Peterson lied. Hilarious.

    What Peterson did was stop listening to the folks who got him there…the precinct folks left him, or were unenthusiastic for Term 3.

    He didn’t lie.

    Despite what Ernie says.

    It was a colossal train wreck of increased property taxes, property tax recalculation, and an arrogant August budget presentation where folks got locked out of the CC Building in sweltering heat. Those images were stunning.

    He lost. Make no mistake. But this “lie” moniker really needs to take a breather, lest its too-oft casual repeating make us numb to the word.

  • Think Again

    Ditto.

    There’s probably still hope for both of us.

    But your megaphone is overused. Pick your battles better.

  • Abdul

    I’m Abdul, which puts me far above mortal men!

  • indyernie

    TA he did lie. Peterson lied to every LEO in Indianapolis and Kennedy was his deputy at that time. His lying to LEO’s was just the tip of the iceberg that sunk his rowboat. Peterson lied and I have the T shirt to prove it.
    I do enjoy Ballard’s term and I will enjoy his reelection victory party AND I be wearing my tux at Ballard’s next inauguration ball.

  • Ash

    I’m actually… shocked. That’s easily the most partisan, subjective statement I’ve ever heard from you. And I do expect better. I don’t know that it even deserves a cogent response.

  • Brodman Rodman

    Thanks for reinforcing my point with drivel.

  • Think Again

    Cogent? Facts are sometimes bitter pills.

    Ernie, I want yesterday’s weather to be repeated all week. Saying it over and over wont make it so.

    Ditto with you and “Peterson’s lies.” Here’s a news flash: Peterson lost. Ballard won.

    Then the barge law firms auctioned off a bunch of assets, and we all lost, and soon voters will choose again. It happens every four years.

  • Ash

    So take your medicine, my friend. I think your point is that when the debate reduces to accusing the other guy/gal of lying it’s counter-productive and meaningless.

    I think that’s a workable logic, but that means Greg Ballard hasn’t lied, and neither did Bush, Clinton, etc. You can call the game however you like ref, but you’re going to get complaints if you don’t start calling it evenly.

  • Anonymous

    Anyone else notice that Abdul works for WRTV? Could someone have been a whistle blower? I think I’ll make that rumor up on my blog and spread it randomly.

    Just kidding Abdul.

  • Abdul

    My pleasure!

  • Abdul

    No problem. You know me and my media whoring!