<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RINOs and DINOs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html</link>
	<description>Indiana Barrister is the source for local Indianapolis and Indiana news, politics and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IndyRacer57</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-30844</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyRacer57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-30844</guid>
		<description>Funny that no one mentions what else is in this &quot;Heath Bill&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Health Disparities – the bill specifically designates LGBT people as a health disparities population, opening up health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity. With collection of data and funding of research, we can better address the specific health issues facing LGBT people. &lt;br&gt;Unequal Taxation of Domestic Partner Benefits – the bill ends the unfair taxation of employer-provided domestic partner health benefits, incorporating the language of the Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act. Without this tax penalty, more people will be able to afford employer-provided coverage for their families, and more companies will be able to offer these important benefits. &lt;br&gt;Early Treatment for HIV under Medicaid – the bill also incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which allows states to cover early HIV treatment under their Medicaid programs, instead of withholding treatment for Medicaid recipients until they develop full-blown AIDS, This will dramatically improve the quality of life for low-income people with HIV, as well as saving taxpayers money and reducing the transmission of the virus. &lt;br&gt;Comprehensive Sex Education – the bill provides funding for comprehensive sex education programs that focus not only on abstinence, but also reducing teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. After more than $1 billion wasted on failed and discriminatory abstinence-only programs, this funding will provide youth, including LGBT students, with the tools they need to live healthy lives. &lt;br&gt;Non-discrimination – the bill prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care. HRC worked with a coalition of civil rights groups to develop and lobby for this language and we believe it will help protect LGBT people from discrimination in the health care system, where there are currently no federal protections for our community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that no one mentions what else is in this &#8220;Heath Bill&#8221;</p>
<p>Health Disparities – the bill specifically designates LGBT people as a health disparities population, opening up health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity. With collection of data and funding of research, we can better address the specific health issues facing LGBT people. <br />Unequal Taxation of Domestic Partner Benefits – the bill ends the unfair taxation of employer-provided domestic partner health benefits, incorporating the language of the Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act. Without this tax penalty, more people will be able to afford employer-provided coverage for their families, and more companies will be able to offer these important benefits. <br />Early Treatment for HIV under Medicaid – the bill also incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which allows states to cover early HIV treatment under their Medicaid programs, instead of withholding treatment for Medicaid recipients until they develop full-blown AIDS, This will dramatically improve the quality of life for low-income people with HIV, as well as saving taxpayers money and reducing the transmission of the virus. <br />Comprehensive Sex Education – the bill provides funding for comprehensive sex education programs that focus not only on abstinence, but also reducing teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. After more than $1 billion wasted on failed and discriminatory abstinence-only programs, this funding will provide youth, including LGBT students, with the tools they need to live healthy lives. <br />Non-discrimination – the bill prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care. HRC worked with a coalition of civil rights groups to develop and lobby for this language and we believe it will help protect LGBT people from discrimination in the health care system, where there are currently no federal protections for our community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyAries</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-30843</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyAries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-30843</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t mean to hijack the thread, but...it&#039;s been several days since the Ft. Hood incident.  I don&#039;t understand why there has not been a thread posted on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back to the thread...&quot;LMAO at Aires....Lawyer, Liarrrrr.....been watching Madea?&quot; -- Name&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, never heard of Madea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t mean to hijack the thread, but&#8230;it&#39;s been several days since the Ft. Hood incident.  I don&#39;t understand why there has not been a thread posted on it.</p>
<p>Back to the thread&#8230;&#8221;LMAO at Aires&#8230;.Lawyer, Liarrrrr&#8230;..been watching Madea?&#8221; &#8212; Name</p>
<p>Nope, never heard of Madea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyRacer57</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28765</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyRacer57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28765</guid>
		<description>Funny that no one mentions what else is in this &quot;Heath Bill&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Health Disparities – the bill specifically designates LGBT people as a health disparities population, opening up health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity. With collection of data and funding of research, we can better address the specific health issues facing LGBT people. &lt;br&gt;Unequal Taxation of Domestic Partner Benefits – the bill ends the unfair taxation of employer-provided domestic partner health benefits, incorporating the language of the Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act. Without this tax penalty, more people will be able to afford employer-provided coverage for their families, and more companies will be able to offer these important benefits. &lt;br&gt;Early Treatment for HIV under Medicaid – the bill also incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which allows states to cover early HIV treatment under their Medicaid programs, instead of withholding treatment for Medicaid recipients until they develop full-blown AIDS, This will dramatically improve the quality of life for low-income people with HIV, as well as saving taxpayers money and reducing the transmission of the virus. &lt;br&gt;Comprehensive Sex Education – the bill provides funding for comprehensive sex education programs that focus not only on abstinence, but also reducing teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. After more than $1 billion wasted on failed and discriminatory abstinence-only programs, this funding will provide youth, including LGBT students, with the tools they need to live healthy lives. &lt;br&gt;Non-discrimination – the bill prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care. HRC worked with a coalition of civil rights groups to develop and lobby for this language and we believe it will help protect LGBT people from discrimination in the health care system, where there are currently no federal protections for our community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that no one mentions what else is in this &#8220;Heath Bill&#8221;</p>
<p>Health Disparities – the bill specifically designates LGBT people as a health disparities population, opening up health data collection and grant programs focused on health disparities related to sexual orientation and gender identity. With collection of data and funding of research, we can better address the specific health issues facing LGBT people. <br />Unequal Taxation of Domestic Partner Benefits – the bill ends the unfair taxation of employer-provided domestic partner health benefits, incorporating the language of the Tax Equity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act. Without this tax penalty, more people will be able to afford employer-provided coverage for their families, and more companies will be able to offer these important benefits. <br />Early Treatment for HIV under Medicaid – the bill also incorporates the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which allows states to cover early HIV treatment under their Medicaid programs, instead of withholding treatment for Medicaid recipients until they develop full-blown AIDS, This will dramatically improve the quality of life for low-income people with HIV, as well as saving taxpayers money and reducing the transmission of the virus. <br />Comprehensive Sex Education – the bill provides funding for comprehensive sex education programs that focus not only on abstinence, but also reducing teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases. After more than $1 billion wasted on failed and discriminatory abstinence-only programs, this funding will provide youth, including LGBT students, with the tools they need to live healthy lives. <br />Non-discrimination – the bill prohibits consideration of personal characteristics unrelated to the provision of health care. HRC worked with a coalition of civil rights groups to develop and lobby for this language and we believe it will help protect LGBT people from discrimination in the health care system, where there are currently no federal protections for our community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyAries</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28764</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyAries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28764</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t mean to hijack the thread, but...it&#039;s been several days since the Ft. Hood incident.  I don&#039;t understand why there has not been a thread posted on it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back to the thread...&quot;LMAO at Aires....Lawyer, Liarrrrr.....been watching Madea?&quot; -- Name&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nope, never heard of Madea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t mean to hijack the thread, but&#8230;it&#39;s been several days since the Ft. Hood incident.  I don&#39;t understand why there has not been a thread posted on it.</p>
<p>Back to the thread&#8230;&#8221;LMAO at Aires&#8230;.Lawyer, Liarrrrr&#8230;..been watching Madea?&#8221; &#8212; Name</p>
<p>Nope, never heard of Madea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malercous</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28762</link>
		<dc:creator>malercous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28762</guid>
		<description>Abdul; First off, it has historicaly been about 1/3 on each end of the spectrum, with the remainder going vacilitating between either side, or indifferent to the particular cause. You were close though.&lt;br&gt;Second; The country has been moving to the right since the mid 70&#039;s, and the Republicans have been purging the party of liberals (Nelson Rockefeller types need not apply) ever since in order to maintain ideological purity. They have succeeded. In doing so, they have alienated a lot of voters because the country is not that far right.&lt;br&gt;The Democrats, being a politically incohesive party, and especially now when they need the votes in Congress, are turning up the heat on their conservative members who vote with them only slightly more often than they do the Republicans. &lt;br&gt;The Dems historically cannot enact legislation unless they have the W.H. and overwhelming majorites in both houses, and then just barely. The Reps do not have this problem as they enforce the party line very well. This mostly stems from the Dems being an all-inclusive party, catering to everyone, whereas the Reps have a narrower base. And the fact that the Reps are simply just better at politics. They know the value of cohesiveness in congress. &lt;br&gt;Right now, as all can see, the Reps are simply stalling and being obstructionist, trying to &quot;run out the clock&quot; until the midterm election. They know that the party in power almost always loses power then, especially if they cannot accomplish anything. Hence, their obstructionism. The Reps won&#039;t be content to just vote No, they will threaten to fillibuster anything the Dems put forth. This is something the Dems don&#039;t threaten near as much. (I say &quot;threaten&quot; because anymore an actual fillibuster is a rarity)&lt;br&gt;Personaly, if I were H. Reid, I&#039;d make `em fillibuster for a week to show the country how much the Reps don&#039;t want anything to change. That would ensure the Dems of an off-season victory and get the conservative Dems back in line. But, once again, the Dems aren&#039;t that good at politics. &lt;br&gt;As it stands now my friend, you have no place in the Republican party, they don&#039;t want you. I know you try, what with rockin&#039; that Republican look with the freudian cigar and all, but unless you&#039;re willing to drink their Kool-Aid you won&#039;t be truly &quot;in.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abdul; First off, it has historicaly been about 1/3 on each end of the spectrum, with the remainder going vacilitating between either side, or indifferent to the particular cause. You were close though.<br />Second; The country has been moving to the right since the mid 70&#39;s, and the Republicans have been purging the party of liberals (Nelson Rockefeller types need not apply) ever since in order to maintain ideological purity. They have succeeded. In doing so, they have alienated a lot of voters because the country is not that far right.<br />The Democrats, being a politically incohesive party, and especially now when they need the votes in Congress, are turning up the heat on their conservative members who vote with them only slightly more often than they do the Republicans. <br />The Dems historically cannot enact legislation unless they have the W.H. and overwhelming majorites in both houses, and then just barely. The Reps do not have this problem as they enforce the party line very well. This mostly stems from the Dems being an all-inclusive party, catering to everyone, whereas the Reps have a narrower base. And the fact that the Reps are simply just better at politics. They know the value of cohesiveness in congress. <br />Right now, as all can see, the Reps are simply stalling and being obstructionist, trying to &#8220;run out the clock&#8221; until the midterm election. They know that the party in power almost always loses power then, especially if they cannot accomplish anything. Hence, their obstructionism. The Reps won&#39;t be content to just vote No, they will threaten to fillibuster anything the Dems put forth. This is something the Dems don&#39;t threaten near as much. (I say &#8220;threaten&#8221; because anymore an actual fillibuster is a rarity)<br />Personaly, if I were H. Reid, I&#39;d make `em fillibuster for a week to show the country how much the Reps don&#39;t want anything to change. That would ensure the Dems of an off-season victory and get the conservative Dems back in line. But, once again, the Dems aren&#39;t that good at politics. <br />As it stands now my friend, you have no place in the Republican party, they don&#39;t want you. I know you try, what with rockin&#39; that Republican look with the freudian cigar and all, but unless you&#39;re willing to drink their Kool-Aid you won&#39;t be truly &#8220;in.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28761</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28761</guid>
		<description>LMAO at Aires....Lawyer, Liarrrrr.....been watching Madea?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rico, you can wallow in your pathetic interpretations all you want.  It is a fact that most Americans are NOT satisfied with the health care system&#039;s financial side...it&#039;s been running amuk for decades.  That lack of national, collective and consistent oversight has allowed insurance companies, as just one part of the problem, to escape meaningful regulation for a long time.  The 50-state patchwork regulatory system is so full of loopholes, it&#039;s like Swiss cheese.  And don&#039;t think the insurers fail to recognizer that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tort reform.  What a joke of an issue to hang your hat on...go ahead and reform it.  Indiana has one of the nation&#039;s &quot;best&quot; medical tort laws, put in place by a doctor governor whose tax policies have choked us since 1973.  He doubled the sales tax, in case you&#039;ve forgotten, and put in place a restrictive med malpractice cap.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Which has not worked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So much for your solutions.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;ve done it your way for a long time, Rico.  It&#039;s broken.  Beyond repair.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Step aside.  Those footsteps you hear in the background are President Obama and mindful legislators who will change this system.  With or without you.  (Note once again, like it or not, your failure to address our President with respect is indicative of your  level of common understanding of protocol and decorum.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jump in.  The water&#039;s warm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And any time you want to debate the founders&#039; intent, have at it.  It won&#039;t be a fair fight, tho.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Poof.  Be gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO at Aires&#8230;.Lawyer, Liarrrrr&#8230;..been watching Madea?</p>
<p>Rico, you can wallow in your pathetic interpretations all you want.  It is a fact that most Americans are NOT satisfied with the health care system&#39;s financial side&#8230;it&#39;s been running amuk for decades.  That lack of national, collective and consistent oversight has allowed insurance companies, as just one part of the problem, to escape meaningful regulation for a long time.  The 50-state patchwork regulatory system is so full of loopholes, it&#39;s like Swiss cheese.  And don&#39;t think the insurers fail to recognizer that.</p>
<p>Tort reform.  What a joke of an issue to hang your hat on&#8230;go ahead and reform it.  Indiana has one of the nation&#39;s &#8220;best&#8221; medical tort laws, put in place by a doctor governor whose tax policies have choked us since 1973.  He doubled the sales tax, in case you&#39;ve forgotten, and put in place a restrictive med malpractice cap.  </p>
<p>Which has not worked.</p>
<p>So much for your solutions.  </p>
<p>We&#39;ve done it your way for a long time, Rico.  It&#39;s broken.  Beyond repair.  </p>
<p>Step aside.  Those footsteps you hear in the background are President Obama and mindful legislators who will change this system.  With or without you.  (Note once again, like it or not, your failure to address our President with respect is indicative of your  level of common understanding of protocol and decorum.)</p>
<p>Jump in.  The water&#39;s warm.</p>
<p>And any time you want to debate the founders&#39; intent, have at it.  It won&#39;t be a fair fight, tho.</p>
<p>Poof.  Be gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson46201</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28760</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson46201</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28760</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rico&quot; is such the model of Christian chastity of speech and modesty of demeanour ! Stay classy, Rico. Stay classy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rico&#8221; is such the model of Christian chastity of speech and modesty of demeanour ! Stay classy, Rico. Stay classy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rico</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28758</link>
		<dc:creator>Rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28758</guid>
		<description>Okay, a-hole.  You got me. You&#039;re smarter than all of us!! I am humbled at the depth and breadth of your knowledge. Shouldn&#039;t you be diving into someone&#039;s dumpster about now?  Oh, I&#039;m sorry.  It&#039;ll be better after dinner.  That way you&#039;ll know what your political enemies (aka Carson political enemies) eat.  Hell, you may get some good scraps too. Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, a-hole.  You got me. You&#39;re smarter than all of us!! I am humbled at the depth and breadth of your knowledge. Shouldn&#39;t you be diving into someone&#39;s dumpster about now?  Oh, I&#39;m sorry.  It&#39;ll be better after dinner.  That way you&#39;ll know what your political enemies (aka Carson political enemies) eat.  Hell, you may get some good scraps too. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndyAries</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28759</link>
		<dc:creator>IndyAries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28759</guid>
		<description>&quot;...and separation of church and state (where again is that in our Constitution)&quot;. -- Rico&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rico, it was placed in &#039;case law&#039; by a Lawyer in a Robe (aka LiaR).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;and separation of church and state (where again is that in our Constitution)&#8221;. &#8212; Rico</p>
<p>Rico, it was placed in &#39;case law&#39; by a Lawyer in a Robe (aka LiaR).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson46201</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/11/rinos_and_dinos.html/comment-page-1#comment-28757</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson46201</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=3031#comment-28757</guid>
		<description>pssst: any Hoosier who claims they are a registered Republican or Democrat is woefully ignorant of basic law, civics and political process. *cough*Rico*cough* The only time any party interest of a voter gets noticed is just in a spring Primary Election where you express a one-time-only preference. Some other states do have a party registration process but not Indiana!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pssst: any Hoosier who claims they are a registered Republican or Democrat is woefully ignorant of basic law, civics and political process. *cough*Rico*cough* The only time any party interest of a voter gets noticed is just in a spring Primary Election where you express a one-time-only preference. Some other states do have a party registration process but not Indiana!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

