<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Just Me&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html</link>
	<description>Indiana Barrister is the source for local Indianapolis and Indiana news, politics and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-30603</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-30603</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-california-to-investigate-acorn/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-cali...&lt;/a&gt; Could this be the first democrat to investigate Acorn?  And, did Acorn ever aid any republicans?  Is voter fraud an exclusive democrat thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-california-to-investigate-acorn/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-cali.." rel="nofollow">http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-cali..</a>. Could this be the first democrat to investigate Acorn?  And, did Acorn ever aid any republicans?  Is voter fraud an exclusive democrat thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27536</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27536</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-california-to-investigate-acorn/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-cali...&lt;/a&gt; Could this be the first democrat to investigate Acorn?  And, did Acorn ever aid any republicans?  Is voter fraud an exclusive democrat thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-california-to-investigate-acorn/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-cali.." rel="nofollow">http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/01/its-on-cali..</a>. Could this be the first democrat to investigate Acorn?  And, did Acorn ever aid any republicans?  Is voter fraud an exclusive democrat thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27522</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27522</guid>
		<description>Just remember that both houses of Congress are filled with rummies and dummies or as a wit once remarked the first group of organized criminals.  It is their own A for the CYA effort.  The smart procedure would have been to end their 501C3 status followed by an investigation (wherein the democrats would investigate themselves). It wouldn&#039;t take long for them to deal with ACORN&#039;s misuse of tax dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remember that both houses of Congress are filled with rummies and dummies or as a wit once remarked the first group of organized criminals.  It is their own A for the CYA effort.  The smart procedure would have been to end their 501C3 status followed by an investigation (wherein the democrats would investigate themselves). It wouldn&#39;t take long for them to deal with ACORN&#39;s misuse of tax dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27436</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27436</guid>
		<description>I guess I don&#039;t know how to post correctly and since I know comments can be deleted how about erasing all those duplicates? Meanwhile, &lt;a href=&quot;http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/28/acorns-man-in-the-white-house/1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/28/acorns...&lt;/a&gt;  This is where Abdul&#039;s attainder theory arose. Arm in arm with Jerry Nadler!  Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I don&#39;t know how to post correctly and since I know comments can be deleted how about erasing all those duplicates? Meanwhile, <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/28/acorns-man-in-the-white-house/1" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/28/acorns.." rel="nofollow">http://spectator.org/archives/2009/09/28/acorns..</a>.  This is where Abdul&#39;s attainder theory arose. Arm in arm with Jerry Nadler!  Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27401</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27401</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this correction?&lt;br&gt;View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM &lt;br&gt;In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#039;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#039;Keefe&#039;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#039;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &quot;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&quot; Larson&#039;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.&lt;br&gt;   Pascal&#039;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#039;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction?<br />View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM <br />In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#39;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#39;Keefe&#39;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:</p>
<p>Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#39;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.</p>
<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &#8220;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&#8221; Larson&#39;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.<br />   Pascal&#39;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#39;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27402</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27402</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this correction?&lt;br&gt;View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM &lt;br&gt;In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#039;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#039;Keefe&#039;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#039;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &quot;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&quot; Larson&#039;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.&lt;br&gt;   Pascal&#039;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#039;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction?<br />View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM <br />In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#39;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#39;Keefe&#39;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:</p>
<p>Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#39;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.</p>
<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &#8220;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&#8221; Larson&#39;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.<br />   Pascal&#39;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#39;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27399</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27399</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this correction?&lt;br&gt;View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM &lt;br&gt;In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#039;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#039;Keefe&#039;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#039;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &quot;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&quot; Larson&#039;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.&lt;br&gt;   Pascal&#039;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#039;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction?<br />View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM <br />In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#39;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#39;Keefe&#39;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:</p>
<p>Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#39;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.</p>
<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &#8220;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&#8221; Larson&#39;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.<br />   Pascal&#39;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#39;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27400</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27400</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this correction?&lt;br&gt;View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM &lt;br&gt;In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#039;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#039;Keefe&#039;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#039;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &quot;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&quot; Larson&#039;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.&lt;br&gt;   Pascal&#039;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#039;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction?<br />View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM <br />In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#39;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#39;Keefe&#39;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:</p>
<p>Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#39;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.</p>
<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &#8220;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&#8221; Larson&#39;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.<br />   Pascal&#39;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#39;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27397</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27397</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this correction?&lt;br&gt;View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM &lt;br&gt;In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#039;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#039;Keefe&#039;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#039;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &quot;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&quot; Larson&#039;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.&lt;br&gt;   Pascal&#039;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#039;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction?<br />View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM <br />In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#39;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#39;Keefe&#39;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:</p>
<p>Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#39;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.</p>
<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &#8220;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&#8221; Larson&#39;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.<br />   Pascal&#39;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#39;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pascal</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2009/09/not_just_me.html/comment-page-1#comment-27398</link>
		<dc:creator>pascal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=2766#comment-27398</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this correction?&lt;br&gt;View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM &lt;br&gt;In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#039;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#039;Keefe&#039;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#039;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &quot;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&quot; Larson&#039;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.&lt;br&gt;   Pascal&#039;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#039;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction?<br />View Responses     Share Post   PrintSeptember 29, 2009 Posted by Scott at 6:08 AM <br />In their September 18 story on the exposure of ACORN by James O&#39;Keefe and Hannah Giles, Washington Post reporters Darryl Fears and Carol Leonnig fabricated the existence of a quote indicating the existence of a racial animus behind O&#39;Keefe&#39;s work. When called on to supply the quote, the Post instead ran this correction:</p>
<p>Th[e] article about the community organizing group ACORN incorrectly said that a conservative journalist targeted the organization for hidden-camera videos partly because its voter-registration drives bring Latinos and African Americans to the polls. Although ACORN registers people mostly from those groups, the maker of the videos, James E. O&#39;Keefe, did not specifically mention them.</p>
<p>What&#39;s wrong with this correction (and the related AP correction)? Gary Larson (not the cartoonist) explicates the text in &#8220;Washington Post admits to bogus quote.&#8221; Larson&#39;s column provides a disgusting footnote to a disgusting story.<br />   Pascal&#39;s comment is that journalists lie.  Most of their lies don&#39;t catch up with them.  Source:Powerline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

