Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Budget’s First Step

Indiana lawmakers took their first major step today toward passing a budget.  By a vote of 14-9, the House Ways and Means Committee passed a one-year spending plan totaling $14.5 billion.

The budget includes more than $308 million in new spending; most of which goes for education which was not included in Governor Daniels’ budget and $26 million less in economic development. 

House Democrats say they are meeting the state’s obligation to maintain Indiana’s educational infrastructure, however Republicans say the by the time the money is spent Indiana would only have about a week’s worth of money still left in the bank.  The GOP also called a one-year spending irresponsible while Democrats say it’s the prudent way to handle finances in this economic downturn.

Lawmakers are still waiting to see exactly how much Indiana will receive in the form of economic stimulus from Washington, an amount estimated to be between $4 and $6 billion.

  • JW

    Why am I not surprised that Bauer’s brood shirked their responsibilities as elected officials and passed something that neither Kenley nor Daniels will agree to? When will the nimrods up north stop sending that clown down here to do the people’s business?

  • JW

    Oh yeah, I understand the “horse trading” mentality that goes on down here at the Statehouse, but the November elections should have told these pompous clowns that the people want to take a different tact.

  • Think Again

    Your anger is understood, JW, and shared. However, the clown ratio at the Statehouse is neither partisan nor small, as long as we have:

    Tincher, Breaux, Noe, Hinkle, Burton, and many more.

    I used to hate the thought, but term limits have got to kick in. Longevity is not a virtue in the General Assembly.

    In fact, quite the opposite.

    But, Abdul raises a good point: Biennial budgets were fine 75 years ago. With today’s global economy, and rapidly-changing parameters, a one-year budget is the way every other governmental unit survives.

    Doing otherwise is really irresponsible.

  • David Myers

    Well it looks like the democrats are kepping to their true form, spending. Obama and the democrats on the National screne is spending almost a trillion dollars we do not have not the Indiana democrats wants our state to be broke. Now you know why I usally vote against any democrat running.

  • Jack

    Would agree with statements concerning the way events seem to play out in state and national government circles. If members of the Assembly and Congress each voted their own convictions and representing the total interests of the people they represent–just might be a different outcome on many issues. The concern is that too much “follow the party leaders edicts” that concerns me. It is hard to believe that every Democrat is a super liberal and every Republican is a super conservative –and each always votes for the philosophy they believe in. And please do not give some thought that time to elect a third party unless can be assured it would not function the same way.
    Term limits—we have them already and not needed in law—it is called elections and as voters and community activist we can seek to influence the election outcome if truly believe a change in persons representing us needs changing. Term limits in law would simply restrict our rights to choose to be governed by whom we wish.

  • Retired

    Think again I agree with you their is a need for term limits. Bauer is a jerk, it is a shame they can’t find anyone better than Bosma on the other side. He would only work on legislative prayers and banning gay marrages. The problem with one year budgets is that every year they would spend the entire session on the budget and use it as an excuse to never have time for legislative reform and township consolidation.

blog comments powered by Disqus