<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My 9-11 Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html</link>
	<description>Indiana Barrister is the source for local Indianapolis and Indiana news, politics and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Think Again</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14246</link>
		<dc:creator>Think Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 19:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14246</guid>
		<description>1. No, definitely not safer.(Sen. McCain, if you need any help finding Osama, you needn&#039;t go to the gates of hell...most Americans, indeed anyone with a peabrain, can tell you exactly where he is within a few statute miles. What a tool.
2. Nothing distant about it.  It&#039;s as real as it gets.
3. W&#039;s legacy was never going to be stellar--he&#039;s just not very bright, he&#039;s mean-spirited and he&#039;s got a vindictive streak wider than a Texas tornado. Oh yeah, and he didn&#039;t win in 2000.
4. We win a war on terror, if there is such a thing (Doug is mostly right) by living up to America&#039;s standards and ideals, not &quot;down&quot; to W&#039;s talking points.

We cannot hope to revive our dismal standing among governments and peoples of the world, as long as we don&#039;t uphold the ideals under which we were founded.  

Like we tell our kids, walk the walk...

Mostly, my heart still aches for the families of those whom we lost on 9=11=01.  And for the families of those lost in this stupid testosterone-driven &quot;war&quot; in Iraq.

Bring the soldiers home.  Now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. No, definitely not safer.(Sen. McCain, if you need any help finding Osama, you needn&#8217;t go to the gates of hell&#8230;most Americans, indeed anyone with a peabrain, can tell you exactly where he is within a few statute miles. What a tool.<br />
2. Nothing distant about it.  It&#8217;s as real as it gets.<br />
3. W&#8217;s legacy was never going to be stellar&#8211;he&#8217;s just not very bright, he&#8217;s mean-spirited and he&#8217;s got a vindictive streak wider than a Texas tornado. Oh yeah, and he didn&#8217;t win in 2000.<br />
4. We win a war on terror, if there is such a thing (Doug is mostly right) by living up to America&#8217;s standards and ideals, not &#8220;down&#8221; to W&#8217;s talking points.</p>
<p>We cannot hope to revive our dismal standing among governments and peoples of the world, as long as we don&#8217;t uphold the ideals under which we were founded.  </p>
<p>Like we tell our kids, walk the walk&#8230;</p>
<p>Mostly, my heart still aches for the families of those whom we lost on 9=11=01.  And for the families of those lost in this stupid testosterone-driven &#8220;war&#8221; in Iraq.</p>
<p>Bring the soldiers home.  Now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher on the wall</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14235</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher on the wall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 00:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14235</guid>
		<description>I agree with Doug on his post of September 11th, 2008 at 1:23 pm. Ann Coulter said it best Bush 7 Terrorist O.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Doug on his post of September 11th, 2008 at 1:23 pm. Ann Coulter said it best Bush 7 Terrorist O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ash</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14230</guid>
		<description>Mr. Break, just a minor clarification: terrorists will only be dancing in the streets when they&#039;ve killed every last American.  Or, like in Breslin, they take over a school, kill the boys outright and then rape the girls until an entry is made, at which point they just shoot as many hostages as they can until they themselves get shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Break, just a minor clarification: terrorists will only be dancing in the streets when they&#8217;ve killed every last American.  Or, like in Breslin, they take over a school, kill the boys outright and then rape the girls until an entry is made, at which point they just shoot as many hostages as they can until they themselves get shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taxpayer 834512</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14228</link>
		<dc:creator>Taxpayer 834512</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14228</guid>
		<description>Edit to response to question 3:
&quot;...and our jihad-provoking Israeli support.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit to response to question 3:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;and our jihad-provoking Israeli support.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shorebreak</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14224</link>
		<dc:creator>Shorebreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14224</guid>
		<description>Interesting series of comments and responses regarding the catalyst that has done more to re-shape US domestic and foreign policy than any other single event in US history - including the 19th century war of secession (incorrectly characterized as a &quot;civil war&quot; by the liars who publish our history books) and the Imperial Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that Roosevelt needed to genrate popular support for US entry into WWII.
.
As a result of 9/11 we now have domestic laws that allow US citizens to be classified as terrorists, granting legal authority to federal agents to arrest them without warrant, to imprison them without charge, and to keep their detainment secret from anyone and everyone. That single policy on it&#039;s own should make every patriotic American shudder when considering that our liberty is no longer in the hands of the US Constitution and it&#039;s lawfully coded interpretation. Our liberty is now dependent upon the &quot;good will&quot; or &quot;best intentions&quot; of those who have the authority to classify a citizen as a potential terrorist. And for those who know how the Military Commissions Act defines a potential domestic terrorist, the potential consequences are horrific to most of us if the &quot;wrong&quot; person ever get&#039;s elected.
.
If I were a terrorist who hate&#039;s Americans because of our freedom, I&#039;d be dancing in the streets over that single item, not to mention the hundreds of other changes that erode our Constitutional rights, changing them from &quot;I have a right to...&quot; to &quot;I&#039;m not worried because I&#039;ve done nothing wrong.&quot;
.
Is it all worth it? I can promise you that you&#039;ll get a resounding &quot;yes&quot; from the policy makers like Cheney and Rumsfeld who wrote in 2000 that the US needs a &quot;new Pearl Harbor&quot; if we want to implement aggressive foreign and domestic military policies. And I can also promise you that you would hear a resounding &quot;No&quot; from the thousands of 9/11 first responders who are dying from cancers and other illnesses suffered as a result of White House driven EPA lies in the days, weeks, and months after 9/11.
.
My tribute to the victims and to the heroes of 9/11 is also a poignant reminder of the lies and distortions of the corporate media and the criminal Dem/GOP corporate cabal in Washington whom they work so hard to promote and to protect. Like yesterday - hours of live media from ground zero, while thousands of patriots assembled peacefully outside demanding the truth.
.
Here&#039;s to the victims and to the hero&#039;s. One of the Port Authority police who never came home lived across the street from me in NY. My county lost more FDNY members than any other. The funerals and memorials went on for months. May justice one day be theirs:
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufv1funsVgY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting series of comments and responses regarding the catalyst that has done more to re-shape US domestic and foreign policy than any other single event in US history &#8211; including the 19th century war of secession (incorrectly characterized as a &#8220;civil war&#8221; by the liars who publish our history books) and the Imperial Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that Roosevelt needed to genrate popular support for US entry into WWII.<br />
.<br />
As a result of 9/11 we now have domestic laws that allow US citizens to be classified as terrorists, granting legal authority to federal agents to arrest them without warrant, to imprison them without charge, and to keep their detainment secret from anyone and everyone. That single policy on it&#8217;s own should make every patriotic American shudder when considering that our liberty is no longer in the hands of the US Constitution and it&#8217;s lawfully coded interpretation. Our liberty is now dependent upon the &#8220;good will&#8221; or &#8220;best intentions&#8221; of those who have the authority to classify a citizen as a potential terrorist. And for those who know how the Military Commissions Act defines a potential domestic terrorist, the potential consequences are horrific to most of us if the &#8220;wrong&#8221; person ever get&#8217;s elected.<br />
.<br />
If I were a terrorist who hate&#8217;s Americans because of our freedom, I&#8217;d be dancing in the streets over that single item, not to mention the hundreds of other changes that erode our Constitutional rights, changing them from &#8220;I have a right to&#8230;&#8221; to &#8220;I&#8217;m not worried because I&#8217;ve done nothing wrong.&#8221;<br />
.<br />
Is it all worth it? I can promise you that you&#8217;ll get a resounding &#8220;yes&#8221; from the policy makers like Cheney and Rumsfeld who wrote in 2000 that the US needs a &#8220;new Pearl Harbor&#8221; if we want to implement aggressive foreign and domestic military policies. And I can also promise you that you would hear a resounding &#8220;No&#8221; from the thousands of 9/11 first responders who are dying from cancers and other illnesses suffered as a result of White House driven EPA lies in the days, weeks, and months after 9/11.<br />
.<br />
My tribute to the victims and to the heroes of 9/11 is also a poignant reminder of the lies and distortions of the corporate media and the criminal Dem/GOP corporate cabal in Washington whom they work so hard to promote and to protect. Like yesterday &#8211; hours of live media from ground zero, while thousands of patriots assembled peacefully outside demanding the truth.<br />
.<br />
Here&#8217;s to the victims and to the hero&#8217;s. One of the Port Authority police who never came home lived across the street from me in NY. My county lost more FDNY members than any other. The funerals and memorials went on for months. May justice one day be theirs:<br />
.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufv1funsVgY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufv1funsVgY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Howard</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14223</link>
		<dc:creator>John Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14223</guid>
		<description>They call it simply &#039;hate&#039; because even Obama&#039;s most ardent supporters think it would cause too much negative press if they call it what they really consider it: &#039;blasphemy.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They call it simply &#8216;hate&#8217; because even Obama&#8217;s most ardent supporters think it would cause too much negative press if they call it what they really consider it: &#8216;blasphemy.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy from Fortville</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14222</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy from Fortville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14222</guid>
		<description>Wilson,
While I doubt OBama is NOT a legal or natural citizen, how does challenging and wanting clairification on Obama&#039;s legal citizen status translate to hate?  If someone disagrees or questions your candidate...its hate????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilson,<br />
While I doubt OBama is NOT a legal or natural citizen, how does challenging and wanting clairification on Obama&#8217;s legal citizen status translate to hate?  If someone disagrees or questions your candidate&#8230;its hate????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson46201</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14220</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson46201</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14220</guid>
		<description>Another lengthy cut&amp;paste hate-screed from Jocelyn whats-her-name...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another lengthy cut&amp;paste hate-screed from Jocelyn whats-her-name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7th District Voter</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14218</link>
		<dc:creator>7th District Voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14218</guid>
		<description>Elect the McCain/Palin ticket on November 4th.

Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court on Grounds he is Constitutionally Ineligible for the Presidency
 
by Jeff Schreiber
America&#039;s Right.com

A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.

Philip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit--just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver--for the health of the Democratic Party.

&quot;I filed this action at this time,&quot; Berg stated, &quot;to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.&quot;.

Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator&#039;s background, and in today&#039;s lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &quot;dual loyalties&quot; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia.

Even if Sen. Obama can prove his U.S. citizenship, Berg stated, citing the senator&#039;s use of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii verified as a forgery by three independent document forensic experts, the issue of &quot;multi-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegiance to other countries&quot; remains on the table.

In the lawsuit, Berg states that Sen. Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the senator maintains. Before giving birth, according to the lawsuit, Obama&#039;s mother traveled to Kenya with his father but was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy, &quot;apparently a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight.&quot; As Sen. Obama&#039;s own paternal grandmother, half-brother and half-sister have also claimed, Berg maintains that Stanley Ann Dunham--Obama&#039;s mother--gave birth to little Barack in Kenya and subsequently flew to Hawaii to register the birth.

Berg cites inconsistent accounts of Sen. Obama&#039;s birth, including reports that he was born at two separate hospitals--Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital--in Honolulu, as well a profound lack of birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham, though simple &quot;registry of birth&quot; records for Barack Obama are available in a Hawaiian public records office.

Should Sen. Obama truly have been born in Kenya, Berg writes, the laws on the books at the time of his birth hold that U.S. citizenship may only pass to a child born overseas to a U.S. citizen parent and non-citizen parent if the former was at least 19 years of age. Sen. Obama&#039;s mother was only 18 at the time. Therefore, because U.S. citizenship could not legally be passed on to him, Obama could not be registered as a &quot;natural born&quot; citizen and would therefore be ineligible to seek the presidency pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.

Moreover, even if Sen. Obama could have somehow been deemed &quot;natural born,&quot; that citizenship was lost in or around 1967 when he and his mother took up residency in Indonesia, where Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Berg also states that he possesses copies of Sen. Obama&#039;s registration to Fransiskus Assisi School In Jakarta, Indonesia which clearly show that he was registered under the name &quot;Barry Soetoro&quot; and his citizenship listed as Indonesian.

The Hawaiian birth certificate, Berg says, is a forgery. In the suit, the attorney states that the birth certificate on record is a forgery, has been identified as such by three independent document forensic experts, and actually belonged to Maya Kasandra Soetoro, Sen. Obama&#039;s half-sister.

&quot;Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by Sen. Obama&#039;s lies and obfuscations,&quot; Berg stated. &quot;If the DNC officers ... had performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship as prescribed by constitutional laws.&quot;

&quot;It is unfair to the country,&quot; he continued, &quot;for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question of the ability to serve if elected.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elect the McCain/Palin ticket on November 4th.</p>
<p>Obama Sued in Philadelphia Federal Court on Grounds he is Constitutionally Ineligible for the Presidency</p>
<p>by Jeff Schreiber<br />
America&#8217;s Right.com</p>
<p>A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.</p>
<p>Philip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit&#8211;just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver&#8211;for the health of the Democratic Party.</p>
<p>&#8220;I filed this action at this time,&#8221; Berg stated, &#8220;to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.&#8221;.</p>
<p>Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator&#8217;s background, and in today&#8217;s lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls &#8220;dual loyalties&#8221; due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia.</p>
<p>Even if Sen. Obama can prove his U.S. citizenship, Berg stated, citing the senator&#8217;s use of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii verified as a forgery by three independent document forensic experts, the issue of &#8220;multi-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegiance to other countries&#8221; remains on the table.</p>
<p>In the lawsuit, Berg states that Sen. Obama was born in Kenya, and not in Hawaii as the senator maintains. Before giving birth, according to the lawsuit, Obama&#8217;s mother traveled to Kenya with his father but was prevented from flying back to Hawaii because of the late stage of her pregnancy, &#8220;apparently a normal restriction to avoid births during a flight.&#8221; As Sen. Obama&#8217;s own paternal grandmother, half-brother and half-sister have also claimed, Berg maintains that Stanley Ann Dunham&#8211;Obama&#8217;s mother&#8211;gave birth to little Barack in Kenya and subsequently flew to Hawaii to register the birth.</p>
<p>Berg cites inconsistent accounts of Sen. Obama&#8217;s birth, including reports that he was born at two separate hospitals&#8211;Kapiolani Hospital and Queens Hospital&#8211;in Honolulu, as well a profound lack of birthing records for Stanley Ann Dunham, though simple &#8220;registry of birth&#8221; records for Barack Obama are available in a Hawaiian public records office.</p>
<p>Should Sen. Obama truly have been born in Kenya, Berg writes, the laws on the books at the time of his birth hold that U.S. citizenship may only pass to a child born overseas to a U.S. citizen parent and non-citizen parent if the former was at least 19 years of age. Sen. Obama&#8217;s mother was only 18 at the time. Therefore, because U.S. citizenship could not legally be passed on to him, Obama could not be registered as a &#8220;natural born&#8221; citizen and would therefore be ineligible to seek the presidency pursuant to Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution.</p>
<p>Moreover, even if Sen. Obama could have somehow been deemed &#8220;natural born,&#8221; that citizenship was lost in or around 1967 when he and his mother took up residency in Indonesia, where Stanley Ann Dunham married Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen. Berg also states that he possesses copies of Sen. Obama&#8217;s registration to Fransiskus Assisi School In Jakarta, Indonesia which clearly show that he was registered under the name &#8220;Barry Soetoro&#8221; and his citizenship listed as Indonesian.</p>
<p>The Hawaiian birth certificate, Berg says, is a forgery. In the suit, the attorney states that the birth certificate on record is a forgery, has been identified as such by three independent document forensic experts, and actually belonged to Maya Kasandra Soetoro, Sen. Obama&#8217;s half-sister.</p>
<p>&#8220;Voters donated money, goods and services to elect a nominee and were defrauded by Sen. Obama&#8217;s lies and obfuscations,&#8221; Berg stated. &#8220;If the DNC officers &#8230; had performed one ounce of due diligence we would not find ourselves in this emergency predicament, one week away from making a person the nominee who has lost their citizenship as a child and failed to even perform the basic steps of regaining citizenship as prescribed by constitutional laws.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;It is unfair to the country,&#8221; he continued, &#8220;for candidates of either party to become the nominee when there is any question of the ability to serve if elected.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2008/09/my_9-11_questions.html/comment-page-1#comment-14217</link>
		<dc:creator>David Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/?p=1403#comment-14217</guid>
		<description>If you (want to) remember the feelings of Americans after 911 some 70% were ready to strike out against someone and they supported the invasion of Iraq. Congress Voted to use force in Iraq. Yes Bush order that invasion but what would people have been saying if he had not and we were attacked again? He was only doing what most of the American people and Congress was behind. That is until they found out that people die in war, then and only then was it Bush’s mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you (want to) remember the feelings of Americans after 911 some 70% were ready to strike out against someone and they supported the invasion of Iraq. Congress Voted to use force in Iraq. Yes Bush order that invasion but what would people have been saying if he had not and we were attacked again? He was only doing what most of the American people and Congress was behind. That is until they found out that people die in war, then and only then was it Bush’s mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

