Comments on: WAS THERE SOMETHING ROTTEN IN THE STATE OF “DEM”MARK?

By: Shorebreak

Shorebreak — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:44:16 +0000

Here’s something rotten, from the prosecutor who placed Charles Manson behind bars:
.
http://www.prosecutionofbush.com/

By: Jerry

Jerry — Fri, 30 May 2008 18:29:12 +0000

That’s what PEGs are for - talk to Comcast.
It is better to run them privately as the company is responsible for the content and not the city.

By: Melyssa

Melyssa — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:42:38 +0000

By the way, I am not a cable subscriber therefore I do not get Channel 16. I do understand that in the future we will possibly have government access TV for free via a digital channel. I think citizens should not have to pay to get government access TV. It should be funded by our tax dollars.

By: Melyssa

Melyssa — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:10:53 +0000

David, Do you realize my activism cost me about $30,000 in lost commissions last year due to the time I gave it? You have nerve saying I wasn’t active. I gave up plenty of my life to help my city, but I am not going to sacrifice my job and my significant other to the activism and it was headed that way.

By: Taxpayer 834512

Taxpayer 834512 — Fri, 30 May 2008 14:39:11 +0000

Mr. Myers: Thanks for your efforts & sorry I didn’t make it. I can only suggest same thing I asked Abdul: If there’s a hearing, meeting, rally or whatever that’s in the ideological ballpark of the collective disgust felt this past summer, please let us know (I suggest this blog). It doesn’t guarantee participation & some are understandably jaded, but it beats not knowing about it. If you did this and I missed it, pardon again.

By: David Myers

David Myers — Fri, 30 May 2008 11:09:09 +0000

If you want to read the whole report on the last meeting, I posted it to http://indianapolsnewgoverment2008.blogspot.com/2008/05/more-on-investigation-of-monroe-gray.html

By: David Myers

David Myers — Fri, 30 May 2008 11:05:12 +0000

Melyssa,

Thanks for non support from all of you, I see the ethics violations investigation has died once again. Go watch it on the channle 16 web site. I forced a meeting by sending a complaint to the full counslor on this a couple of months ago. There was three hearings were held. The last one the committee decided that there was no public interested. So I do not look for a future hearing to be held. Its a shame after the election that citizens let this fall once again to the way side after all the attention it got before the election.

By: Bob

Bob — Fri, 30 May 2008 00:46:18 +0000

Peterson wrote an endorsement letter prior to slating endorsing Dane Mahern’s opponent.

The Maherns have worn out their welcome in this town. Think again has it right - dead on.

By: Think Again

Think Again — Thu, 29 May 2008 20:35:12 +0000

Dane Mahern can SAY anything he wants–I happen to know Bart Peterson didn’t call anyone from Boston to retalliate regarding the COIT vote. He did take some phone calls, from loyalists who asked that question, and to more than one, he replied: “I don’t care.” He’s just not that bitter. It’s not the way he operates. Frankly, if he’d kept better score during his second term, of his enemies and friends, and rewarded his friends as well as he rewarded the goofballs, he might still be mayor. Strike that. He WOULD still be mayor.

PP, darlin, Mahern did it to himself. It was karma. LOTS of knives out there waiting to stab him. He had many stiffs there himself. Brothers, cousins, spouses…try to pay attention, huh? The little worm got what he deserved, and we got a better legislative candidate. And since the Dems lost the council, we don’t have to watch those agonizing Ch. 16 committee hearings he used to chair. That, dear friends, was mental torture.

By: GOP Pine Rider

GOP Pine Rider — Thu, 29 May 2008 19:56:09 +0000

Dane has said Mayor P campaigned against him (calling PC’s from Boston) in his attempt to be slated for House District 97 because he the voted against 65% COIT increase.