Comments on: NOW HERE’S SOMETHING THAT DOESN’T HAPPEN EVERYDAY

By: Andy Horning

Andy Horning — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:17:19 +0000

So what happened to the site? It’s gone now.

By: Sherry Wallace

Sherry Wallace — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:48:19 +0000

Hi Abdul,

We need Indy Undercover. I’ve been reading it for quite a while and have sent the site to many of my friends.

Abdul, I think you do a great job helping Indianapolis. Keep it up!

By: Flush Out

Flush Out — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:27:24 +0000

Abdul, Don’t know who your source is, but this maybe a ruse to flush out sources within the dept. Tell everyone to be very careful, and not to rush to give up info right away. They are looking to burn people.

By: Susan

Susan — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:25:29 +0000

Abdul,
I sincerely doubt that Frank is behind this, but that doesn’t mean his choice for the next sheriff isn’t. Something to think about!

By: Scott

Scott — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:43:40 +0000

Oh it doesn’t surprise me. Look at a LT. that lead a high speed unit connected with the ATF. Could it be that he was removed put on Administrative leave because a certain Deputy Chief of Investigations was upset with him. So they tell him there was a threat on the Sheriff on a taped line and they thought it was him. So now he must stay on leave until the FBI comes back with voice results. Wow oh and the same chief that has moved or attempted to move several people because he does not care for them even after the city legal says to cool it. Hard to believe he could have had a mental medical? Of course this is all rumor and not intended to be fact and just a suspicion hahah

By: Friend

Friend — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:03:44 +0000

If they took the officers computer away, he should file a grievance with the union if in fact he did nothing against department policy at all. Or has he filed a grievance already? If not, why not? He needs that computer to do his job does he not? If the union doesn’t back him up, he should file a lawsuit using his own money. I know where I work at, no internet at all regardless if it is work related. Did the officer work in internet crimes or online internet crimes? If so, then that would be work related and he would need the computer. If he is a regualr street officer, why would he need internet?

By: Monticello » Why Do I Bother?

Monticello » Why Do I Bother? — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:00:46 +0000

[...] a President Hillary Clinton or President Rudy Giuliani then you have not been paying attention. The events here locally after the recent loss by Mayor Bart Peterson in this year's elections have even shocked this [...]

By: Carefull

Carefull — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:17:01 +0000

Duh
November 17th, 2007 at 6:08 pm
The reason that they took the IMPD department issued computer away from the officer on NE was that he was posting to INDYUNDERCOVER on duty rather than working. Not bright at all. The officer failed to read General Orders regarding computer usage.

Your reason doesn’t hold water. If the officer violated General Orders, I would assume that he would be disiplined. He has not been disiplined at all or been told anything. Also, IndyU was a police related website. No orders ever prohibited officers from looking at it. Perhaps their is no 4 month investigation.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:08:11 +0000

Shorebreak – where have you been? I love your take on things, and as ususual, you don’t disappoint.

By: Shorebreak

Shorebreak — Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:06:24 +0000

Abdul – Make some serious noise about this Monday AM. This isn’t only about you. It’s about all of us.

Be open to your audience about all of the issues and about your involvement with indyundercover – which is perfectly legal, legitimate, and a worthy activity. Try to have several attoreys and officials on the show to explain how this kind of law enforcement activity is unlawful – then start getting the likely suspects on the horn.

Beyond your personal issues in this matter, what’s most important is that the public is aware of what is happening, that they are aware of the illegal/unconstitutional nature of the activity, and that they are aware that it could just as easily happen to them.