Comments on: LET ME TRY TO EXPLAIN THIS ONE MORE TIME http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html Indiana Barrister is the source for local Indianapolis and Indiana news, politics and commentary. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:15:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: melyssa http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html/comment-page-1#comment-4943 melyssa Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:53:10 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html#comment-4943 Please get on the water contract deal. I smell something and it stinks. Peterson "owes" a lot of people and I, for one, don't want him paying them with my money. Please get on the water contract deal. I smell something and it stinks. Peterson “owes” a lot of people and I, for one, don’t want him paying them with my money.

]]> By: Concerned Citizen http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html/comment-page-1#comment-4938 Concerned Citizen Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:13:19 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html#comment-4938 Abdul, this is kind of off this topic, but there was a story on IBJ Daily on Thursday (I think) about the city giving United Water a contract extension for seven years. This is the sort of thing we also should be watching for as Peterson, et. al. prepare to leave office. Was this legit or was this an attempt to stick Ballard with a foolish contract that he can't do anything about? I'm really shocked that you or anyone else in the local blogosphere haven't picked up on this. Can you look into it? Abdul, this is kind of off this topic, but there was a story on IBJ Daily on Thursday (I think) about the city giving United Water a contract extension for seven years. This is the sort of thing we also should be watching for as Peterson, et. al. prepare to leave office. Was this legit or was this an attempt to stick Ballard with a foolish contract that he can’t do anything about?

I’m really shocked that you or anyone else in the local blogosphere haven’t picked up on this. Can you look into it?

]]> By: Friend http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html/comment-page-1#comment-4924 Friend Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:54:17 +0000 http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/11/let_me_try_to_explain_this_one_more_time.html#comment-4924 Interesting. In today's Indystar, GOP Lincoln Plowman wants to get rid of the 65% increase that was recently passed when the GOP takes over in January. Funny thing about it is if they (GOP or Dems) eliminate the tax, the pension fund for public safety will be broke. Not to mention that the recent contracts (salary/benefit increases) by fire and police will not be fulfilled after the mayor and council agreed to it. Interesting. In today’s Indystar, GOP Lincoln Plowman wants to get rid of the 65% increase that was recently passed when the GOP takes over in January. Funny thing about it is if they (GOP or Dems) eliminate the tax, the pension fund for public safety will be broke. Not to mention that the recent contracts (salary/benefit increases) by fire and police will not be fulfilled after the mayor and council agreed to it.

]]>