Comments on: VOTER SUPREME

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:23:30 +0000

Objection! Wilson is assuming he has a brain, but it’s not admitted into evidence!!

By: Wilson46201

Wilson46201 — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:36:43 +0000

…and wearing tinfoil hats will prevent Martians from sending X-rays to fry your brains too! That’s just as likely as VoterID fraud ever was in Indiana.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:51:40 +0000

Bart Peterson, Beth White, Monroe Gray, Julia Carson, Bill Crawford and the ACLU non of these Democrats have a problem with 5 polling places being closed on election day. This malfunction disenfranchised 3500 registered voters. In a close election whose to say if the margin of win for a candidate was lost in 5 precincts.

It is clear the candidates who won in the Primary were the choices for both Political Parties, neither one contested the election results, nor did the ACLU come to the rescue of these voters.

The Democrap’s lawsuit is based on hearsay and not proof of any voter not being able to vote because of no voter ID, but the number of closed polling sites in Marion County confirmed that citizens who wanted to vote could not vote.

Voter ID will prevent the opportunity for voter fraud per precinct.
.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:15:54 +0000

Everyone is potentially disenfranchised when Beth White runs an election.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:08:07 +0000

First, isn’t Wilson banned from this blog? Second, Wilson’s wrong. You can’t prosecute someone for voter fraud when you can’t prove who that person was! Before voter ID you could enter the poll and pick any name on the poll list (supplied by the Dems) and vote. Nobody could file a criminal charge because you could not be tracked down as to your true identity to file a voter fraud charge. NOW voter ID makes you prove you are who you say you are. It is that simple. Nobody is “disenfranchised” and everybody is protected.

By: Jason

Jason — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:07:42 +0000

I actually think doing the thing they did in Baghdad where you dip your thumb in indellible ink might work even better than the Voter ID law, but seeing as how some people can’t even get behind a Voter ID law they would think an inkblot on your thumb was synonymous with a scarlet letter. Heaven forbid!

By: Wilson46201

Wilson46201 — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:50:43 +0000

One would think that with the many years of tough Marion County Republican County Prosecutors Goldsmith, Newman and Brizzi that surely one of them would have indicted somebody for Voter ID Fraud - but you’d be wrong!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:42:46 +0000

Due to cover-ups the frauds of the Dems have not come to light. Voter ID stopped them dead. They used to send buses around from the old folks home and bums on the street promised a brick of Richard’s Wild Irish Rose if they said they were a name on their poll list and voted a ticket.

Proving it beyond a “reasonable” doubt is impossible because you cannot track the offender without Voter ID!!!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:40:11 +0000

The law suit was a laugh! Read it: The Democrats actually have a BMV employee from the Meadows BMV branch (where they made the fraud arrests of BMV employees) named Connie who said that she “couldn’t get ID” in deposition, Connie admitted she had a driver’s license.

The Federal Judge stated that the Democrats case was the equivalent of throwing wet tissue at the wall to see if it will stick.

I hope the Supremes issue more than a rebuke to the Democrats!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:38:46 +0000

Marion County has had voter fraud in elections by knowing Democrats, however they looked the other way when complaints were filed. No, nothing was ever done about it as long as the handpicked candidates won the Primary or general Elections. Voting people in precincts where they do not live is fraud. Say it is so Julia Carson?