Comments on: BAYH PRODUCT

By: varangianguard

varangianguard — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:09:26 +0000

I thought that the point hinged on “in good faith”. I don’t think that Mr. Abdullah went through all of this “in good faith”. He knew he was deceiving both his former constituents and his own party by running and accepting an elected office under fraudulent conditions.

If “in good faith” is the determiner, then I believe that Mr. Abdullah’s votes while fraudulently occupying a Council set would be challengable in court.

By: the_weasel

the_weasel — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:34:36 +0000

So, if my INTENT is to live on the moon, I should not be required to pay any Indiana taxes.

By: Get It Right

Get It Right — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:59:53 +0000

If you’re going to relate the story, Abdul, you need to get it right:

The year was 1986, actually beginning in late 1985. The state Republican Party put up Rob Bowen for SOS, and Evan was running. The Republicans challenged Evan’s residency, and the case was trasnferred to Shelby Circuit COurt.

He was defended by the late Jon Krahulik, whom Evan later rewarded by naming him a Supreme. And he was a damned good one, too.

Evan went on to trounce young Bowen, and the rest, as they say, is history.

But, friend, this did not happen in the gubernatorial race. That is what the GOP feared Evan would go for, and they were brazenly trying to cut him off at the pass. They failed miserably, before a hard-right conservative Republican judge, yet.

And they ended up giving Evan a whole bunch of pity party votes.

Patrice’s pity party is over.

By: mw

mw — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:36:45 +0000

Funny wilson…..but not a woman….sorry to break your heart….you know something Wilson? I feel for you man….why? Because they (democrats) got the blinders over your eyes. Open the shade man and take a look. You just might find that they are real messed up

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:31:45 +0000

mr. wilson, you are such a gadfly it is impossible to ignore you. you have brought this upon yourself. you know that when you embed yourself in politics the way you have, you invite scrutiny of yourself. in addition, you may want to reflect on things you have done to and said about private citizens. you are a hypocrite.

By: FirstTimeCaller

FirstTimeCaller — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:19:55 +0000

I intend to relocate from Indianapolis (and avoid the 65% COIT increase), can I claim residency elsewhere?

Further, I intend to relocate my house with me – out of Washington Township where I was facing an 88% increase. Can the assessor base my property tax on my intended destination.

If Mike O’Connor’s case law works for candidacy, then why not for the taxpayer?

By: see no evil

see no evil — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:03:02 +0000

Puleeeze ignore Wilson.

By: Wilson46201

Wilson46201 — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:46:24 +0000

Poor “MW” is consumed with her nosiness about a private citizen, not an elected official. She wants to distract from serious political discussion onto gossip and innuendo. I bet she buys every copy of those gossip tabloids at the supermarket checkout line!

By: mw

mw — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:21:26 +0000

Abdul…when you are going to come out with the junk on Wilson46204????? I cannot stand waiting…..it is killing me

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:36:59 +0000

What is the “intent” crap? If I “intend” to go to work, will I still get paid? If I had the “intent” in paying my tax bill, will the county accept that? Intent is just a way of side stepping the truth to get out of your responsibilities.