Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

Mitch Daniels 2.0

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels is sounding a theme of practicality over politics as he gears up for re-election. The Governor officially announces his re-election bid Saturday morning, but prior to that he sat down with reporters and pundits to talk about the past, the present and the future.

Somewhat surprisingly, the Governor said that his decision to run for re-election was not an automatic one. He said he didn’t make it until the end of the last legislative session. He said had not known how much change he and his administration would have made, he likely would not have run for a second term.

The focus of his campaign, he says, will be the Indiana economy, continued government reform and convincing Hoosiers to embrace change. He says saving the taxpayers’ money through efficiency and privatization has helped Indiana. He also said that there is a “New Indiana” emerging and the old political alliances are going by the wayside; referring to the political thought that Hoosiers are now more divided by change versus status quo as opposed to political party or region.

He did mention the opposition, saying some of it is sincere and other is pure politics. But what struck me the most is that the Governor is going to try to make the campaign about management rather than ideology.

2008 is a Presidential year, which means the usual wedge issues of immigration, abortion and gay marriage usually find a way to raise to the summit over the more substantive issues of the day. Daniels says those issues; specifically immigration and gay marriage are not a priority of his and plans to leave those to candidates for other offices.

He admitted to making mistakes, specifically not waiting to implement the computer conversion at the Bureau of Motor Vehicles and not presenting the Commerce Connector in a better way. He said if you try as much as we did, “you won’t always hit the bulls eye.”

Democratic Party spokeswoman Jen Wagner said their party was not surprised that Daniels was announcing so early saying he had a long road ahead to repair his image and win back voters. She admits though it will take a unified party with a strong message and a lot of money, but Daniels can be beat.

The Governor seemed to be looking forward to taking another bite at the apple. He says he’ll ask voters to look at the results of the past four years which he described as active, positive and honest. And even if Daniels wins a second term, his opponents won’t have to fret too much, he also said that this will be his last campaign for public office.

Let the campaign begin.

  • Wilson46201

    Abdul, I saw you on TV at 10pm in that little crowd of reporters lapping up Mitch’s campaign talking points …

  • Abdul

    So how will D’s defeat him? Where is the agenda and alternate vision for Indiana? It’s time to put up or shut up.

  • Anonymous

    Who is surprised by Mitch’s announcement? It is as surprising as hearing that Fart Peterson was going to run again. Yes, Mitch has made some mistakes, at least he can admit to them, unlike Fart, Frankie and the gang. With that said, I should say a thank you to Beth “Incompetent” White, she admitted her mistake, it is just too bad she said she would be WONDERFUL when she fell WAY short.

  • Anonymous

    Who is surprised by Mitch’s announcement? It is as surprising as hearing that Fart Peterson was going to run again. Yes, Mitch has made some mistakes, at least he can admit to them, unlike Fart, Frankie and the gang. With that said, I should say a thank you to Beth “Incompetent” White, she admitted her mistake, it is just too bad she said she would be WONDERFUL when she fell WAY short.

  • Max

    Abdul,
    The Democrats don’t have an agenda. Their candidates steal ideas from opponents in their Primaries and use the issues in the Fall. They haven’t been able to gather any new information to steal. Reason why Wilson stays out front changing the debate on key issues on several blogs. Confusing uninformed voters on issues is their method of control.

    Mayor Peterson’s new TV ads are straight out of Mike O’Connor’s workbook. No mention of solutions to current problems facing the city.

    You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.
    Smoke and mirrors all the way!

  • Joe

    Will the Democrats need an alternate vision or plan? I mean, they won the House back with no plan. There are enough folks in Indiana who will vote against Mitch (not for the Democrat on merit, but because they don’t like Mitch) that this election will be closer than it should be, if not a Daniels loss.

    Which would be sad for Indiana.

  • Bumpy Johnson

    I do not believe that the Shell has even the most remote chance of winning in 2008. Remember, there is still a primary for the Dems to get thru and not all Dems are on the Shell’s wagon just yet.
    The Governor’s race will hinge largely on who the Dems and Pubs have on the top of the ticket. In presidential election years the state races are not the major focus of voters in Indiana.
    Daniel’s has a well articulated position on the “real issues” while the Dems are struggling to even “create” issues let alone solutions. The Anti-Toll Road Dem issue is luke warm at best.
    If Hillary is on the rop of the ticket for the Dems it will be one helluva landslide for the GOP in Indiana comparable to the 1980 election.

  • Barbara Spradlin

    Hello Mitch, I need you to know whats going on in Lawrenceburg, Your judge Humphrey, his Tisha Linzy and her people are wasting state funds!!! not sure if humphrey knows whats going on under him, but it appears it would be quite EMBARRASSING, if I were him.. linzy wasted state FUNDS badly, she even admitted it!!!!!!!! forging paper work in her office to get things paid for by this STATE………They both need investigated……unless YOU also want to be EMBARRESSED by the people under YOU !!!!!

  • http://www.colleencoble.com Colleen Coble

    I voted for Mitch the first time but I won’t vote for him again and I’m a staunch Republican. But when he pushed through the daylight saving time, pretty much FORCING the issue, I was done. Every single one of my representatives lied to me too. I’d emailed them about the issue and they assured me they were NOT voting for the measure because their constituents were against it. Then they turned right around and caved to Mitch’s pressure. His saying it was an economic issue was ludicrous. And it’s COST us money not saved us any, according to a California study.

  • MissouriDemocrat

    Colleen Coble dear…. having been raised in Missouri a state that has DST I had often wondered why so many people here opposed it. I still wonder that when I read posts such as yours. Simply put, it is not only crazy to be out of sync with every state surroundings us but darn near stupid. Just because you like your Hoosier individuality and can’t seem to grasp that others that do business with us in other places are inconvenienced by our individuality does not mean that the problem Mitch solved existed every day of the week. We are now part of the rest of the nation…. Let’s leave it alone. I applaud your Representatives and the other brave souls in your party that stood up to you and other to say we will be in sync with the nation time wise. The only thing I don’t like is we should also be in Central Time, not Eastern Time. I hate having to stay up till 11 pm to catch the late night news. When I lived in Missouri we got the Evening news at 5:30 and the Late Evening news at 10… thats more in keeping with those of us that work for a living and need the sleep.

  • http://www.colleencoble.com Colleen Coble

    Just because your friends want to jump off a cliff, does that mean you are going to be that stupid too? LOL It hasn’t hurt Arizona or Hawaii to be smart enough not to follow the pack. I happen to love change–when it’s smart. And this one COST us money. Read the study and tell me who the stupid states are to slavishly follow pack mentality.

    http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB120406767043794825.html

  • MissouriDemocrat

    Funny how some people can’t see the trees for the forest Colleen. You can site all these studies you want but if this were such a terrible costly idea then the rest of the nation with the exception of Arizona and Hawaii which are both in the desert (have you Colleen noticed Indiana is not in the middle of the Pacific Ocean?) is on Daylight Savings Time. That argument about jumping off the cliff doesn’t wash…. By the way, do you own an Outdoor Theatre, I understand they were the ones initially that stopped this in the worlds worst General Assembly. Don’t vote for Mitch, I am a democrat, but if this is the reason, I will cancel your vote because on it alone I feel he is a progressive Governor. God will forgive him being a Republican so can I.

  • http://www.colleencoble.com Colleen Coble

    Nope, I don’t own an outdoor theater. I’m a suspense author. In my next book, maybe I should kill off a DST favoring governor. LOL

    Indiana provided an opportunity to actually STUDY the effects of DST. It was a landmark study because never before had they been able to actually chronicle a before and after. But it’s okay if you want to bury your head in the sand about facts.

    And I will be voting Dem for governor for the first time since I’ve become a voter. I’m sad about it but he’s not my man Mitch anymore.

  • Jon G

    CC,
    “His saying it was an economic issue was ludicrous. And it’s COST us money not saved us any, ”
    -
    You yourself prove that it is an economic issue by saying it “cost us money.” Either it is or it isn’t, make a real stance. The DST issue proved to the rest of the country how backward we in Indiana were, then Mitch fixed, it and now the lame arguments that STILL go on just prove how backward SOME Hoosiers are still.

  • http://www.colleencoble.com Colleen Coble

    Changing to DST cost us money, Jon. You must not have read my post clearly. That’s what I’ve said in every post. The study is clear, if you read it. And DST hasn’t helped our economy that I can see. In our town, we’ve had four major industries close down in the last six months.

    I travel a lot with publicity stuff for my books and most people I talked to before our change said they wished THEIR state didn’t swing. There is a national move afoot to abolish DST. I’d like to see that come about. I’d be the first one to lobby for it. :-)

    And please, can we disagree and at least be civil about it?

  • MissouriDemocrat

    Several years ago at a Greenwood Chamber of Commerce forum I asked then Majority Leader Bob Garton and Senator Borst about this whole issue and the entire room resounded in laughter. I just sat back and listened to the answers in disbelief. I still do. I recall this study and the news coverage of it when it was released and there were some unknown variables that were not factored into the study. The study was flawed on several points according to the news article. I do not recall them all and honestly didn’t intend to get into a DST debate on a blog. Suffice it to say, in my native state we love it. Yes we can respect civility here and agree to disagree. I like Central Time much better, but then I made my home here 22 years ago and have to accept the quirks of Hoosierland.

  • http://www.colleencoble.com Colleen Coble

    This study just came out, Feb I think. It was only made possible by the fact that Indiana switched and they could compare previous energy use pre and post DST. It didn’t even take into account the known effect of higher gasoline consumption.

    I agree with you that we should probably be on Central time. That’s the worst thing about DST–it’s still light at ten o’clock. Hard to get to bed at a decent time if you have to be to work early like my husband and doubly hard if you have to get children to bed.

    I have talked about it on my blog and most folks hate DST who comment over there. But there are some who like the extra daylight. I still wake up at the same real time. LOL My body doesn’t recognize the law! LOL

  • flashback

    I was against DST but now that we have it I can live with it.

    I can now see the need for indiana to be on track with the rest of the nation.cool.however I also believe as a nation DST should be abolished.then everything would still be the same with our dealings with the rest of the states.

    I also would prefer centeral time if we were to be on DST.my problem with gov. daniels is when selling DST he said many times centeral time would be good for the state.after it was passed he denied it.

    indianapolis did not even get to have any hearings on which time zone it had after DST took effect.it was a case of businesses wanted eastern time and thats all we need .

blog comments powered by Disqus