Home

Join

Main Menu



blog advertising is good for you

Links

The Great Compromise of ‘08?

Indiana lawmakers are in the half-time phase of the General Assembly. I say half-time phase because the session is more like a three-period hockey game and we’re in the second period. The third period doesn’t begin until two to three weeks before the session ends. Usually at this point lawmakers stake out positions, play hardball and later compromise by splitting the difference on dollars issues. I don’t see that happening this time.

Look at the five big issues on the table: Lottery privatization, the Commerce Connector and Illiana Expressway, Full Day Kindergarten, Property Tax relief and providing Health insurance for Hoosiers.

FDK – everybody agrees on it, just watch to see how they finally agree to pay for it.

Lottery Privatization – Democrats don’t want it. Most Republicans do. This is a philosophical argument, not money.

Tax Relief – this is about money and philosophy.

Commerce Connector and Illiana Expressway – once again, difference in philosophy.

Health Insurance – this is both about politics and cash.

If the situation was that the differences in all these issues were money and spending, I can see a compromise down the road. However, Democrats and Republicans have deep philosophical differences on these matters and they are either for them or against them. I don’t see much room for negotiations because there really isn’t much to negotiate.

  • Anonymous

    I think you’re mostly right, Abdul, Sad to say.

    FDK is badly needed, but it’s expensive. I’d have a hard time as a legislator paying for it. Here’s a novel thought: cut something else.

    Like upper-level management at: Dept. of Insurance, Dept of Corrections, Dept. of Transportation, State Police, FSSA, Governor’s Office, etc.

    Or, as Peyton would say, “rub some dirt on it.”

  • outstater

    For you to be right, it means party discipline will hold. Not so sure about that — Craig Fry has proven that already this year, several did last session.

    Some horse trading will occur on a few issues. Privatization is probably the last to get enough cross over vote to go, but Roads and Health Insurance (with cig. tax) are still possible. Neither Long or Bauer have enough structural strength to prevent a few defectors.

  • James

    False Marketing. Both parties are addicted to gambling revenue.

    Any leader showing opposition at this point is just posturing for a bigger cut for themselves and their cronies.

    The politicians will do what they always do, use the bait and switch at the end to get even more gambling in our state without directing much of it to the initial stated purpose.

    Most Hoosiers think that lottery, casino, horse tracks, & off track betting revenues already go to education based upon the historical record of promises made by politicians over the past decades.

    Silly voters!!!

  • James

    What ever happened to the “Build Indiana Fund”??

    As I recall this gambling slush fund was put on “hold” by Frank O’Bannon when the Star revealed serious corruption by politicians. Never heard anything after that…..

    http://www2.indystar.com/library/factfiles/gov/legislature/build_indiana_fund/stories/2001_0629.html

  • Anonymous

    There was an EXCELLENT piece on 60 Minutes last night of an interview Steve Kroft did with Comptroller General, David Walker. It clearly spelled out what the problems are not with just Indiana, but with the entire country.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/60minutes/main2528226.shtml

blog comments powered by Disqus