<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Continuing the Culture War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html</link>
	<description>Indiana Barrister is the source for local Indianapolis and Indiana news, politics and commentary.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html/comment-page-1#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html#comment-808</guid>
		<description>It is my understanding that both democrats and republicans that support the marriage amendment will be scrutinized for hypocrisy. I listened to the interview this morning and though I don&#039;t generally approve of such tactics, if my family was under attack, I would more than likely be willing to do whatever it took to protect them. It is unfortunate that things have come to this but it appears that it has. Are the legislators not willing to allow any type of protective rights for unmarried couples? Is there no compromise that could be reached between the two groups?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that both democrats and republicans that support the marriage amendment will be scrutinized for hypocrisy. I listened to the interview this morning and though I don&#8217;t generally approve of such tactics, if my family was under attack, I would more than likely be willing to do whatever it took to protect them. It is unfortunate that things have come to this but it appears that it has. Are the legislators not willing to allow any type of protective rights for unmarried couples? Is there no compromise that could be reached between the two groups?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html/comment-page-1#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 02:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html#comment-807</guid>
		<description>who says he is only digging dirt on republicans?  There are democrats who support SJR7 too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who says he is only digging dirt on republicans?  There are democrats who support SJR7 too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html/comment-page-1#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html#comment-806</guid>
		<description>digging up dirt is a double edged sword...just because bil is only going after republicans doesn&#039;t mean someone won&#039;t start digging up dirt on the democrats.  or it doens&#039;t mean they don&#039;t already have it and are just waiting to expose it...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>digging up dirt is a double edged sword&#8230;just because bil is only going after republicans doesn&#8217;t mean someone won&#8217;t start digging up dirt on the democrats.  or it doens&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t already have it and are just waiting to expose it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html/comment-page-1#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indianabarrister.com/archives/2007/01/continuing_the_culture_war.html#comment-805</guid>
		<description>I heard the interview.

I also responded to Bil&#039;s post yesterday on the matter. I personally don&#039;t support his cause, but I do support his right to pursue it. My recommendation remains the same. Don&#039;t attack anyone for past errors. Expose them for not having the integrity to be up front over past discretions when they pursue an agenda that can be attacked as hypocritical.

Also, integrity is a two way street. Stick to the high road and not post anything that can&#039;t or won&#039;t (think about that one!) be backed up in court.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the interview.</p>
<p>I also responded to Bil&#8217;s post yesterday on the matter. I personally don&#8217;t support his cause, but I do support his right to pursue it. My recommendation remains the same. Don&#8217;t attack anyone for past errors. Expose them for not having the integrity to be up front over past discretions when they pursue an agenda that can be attacked as hypocritical.</p>
<p>Also, integrity is a two way street. Stick to the high road and not post anything that can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t (think about that one!) be backed up in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
