The Indiana Supreme Court published its opinion in PSI Energy, Inc. v. William Lee Roberts, Jr. & Beverly Roberts (pdf). It concludes:

The wisdom of permitting a motion based on sufficiency of the evidence for the first time after trial was addressed in the course of the 1970 overhaul of Indiana trial procedure that brought it generally, but not entirely, in conformity with federal practice. As long as that remains permissible, we think the interest of getting the trial right the first time outweighs any injustice in a given case caused by affirming a result that is justified under the unobjected instructions, but not supported under the law as found by the appellate court.

Posted: 09|27|05 at 11:12 am by Joshua Claybourn
Follow this entry via RSS 2.0. Comments and pings are currently closed.